Chaotic deviation of AI generations or is there still a certain criterion for deviation?

[Olmyntay]

Hello dear friends.
We have already argued with you on this topic, but without much result!
Therefore, I propose a more rational way to identify the cause of the deviation. If this reason, or the quality criterion that would be violated, is really known to someone, then he will easily indicate which of the given images were accepted and which were rejected!

Otherwise, please admit that this is not known and there are no specific reasons for the deviation, and that such deviations have a chaotic principle without any reason!

p.s.

I found a way to also download accepted images in original quality, hope the watermark doesn't hurt anyone!

The only thing is, to upload here, I had to increase the compression, so I uploaded them separately with minimal compression to my Google drive,
This is exactly what they were uploaded to stock:

[link removed by moderator]

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi @Olmyntay ,

The third file has chromatic noise. The fourth file is a little too exposed for my liking.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

[Olmyntay]

Do you mean this third one?

What do you mean, too open?

Is everything ok with the rest of the files?  🙂 

[Abambo]

Do you mean this third one?

By @Olmyntay

Count.

What do you mean, too open?

By @Olmyntay

I did not read that.

[Olmyntay]

do you mean this chromatic noise?

[Abambo]

Chromatic noise is colour noise. You have that in digital photography, especially with high ISO.

[daniellei4510]

Sorry. I have enough games on my phone without needing to play one of yours.

[RALPH_L]

I agree with @daniellei4510 . I will not let you test my competence. We are not always correct and the reviewers are not always correct. As you, my fellow contributor, are not always correct. But, you did agree to the Terms of Service, the last sentence of §6.1, so accept it and move on. Resubmit the rejected items or work on new projects, but do not  attempt to test the people that are trying to assist you. That is non-appreciative.

Adobe_Stock_Contributor_Agreement_Addl_Terms_en_US_20220415.pdf

[Abambo]

The watermark is disturbing, as is the additional compression. If you want to know the defects in an asset, upload them in the original JPEG quality. You can do so by drag and drop:

My time is too precious to look at modified and recompressed assets. I do not visit links here.