• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
1

Copyright disclaimer on stock photos

New Here ,
Mar 15, 2024 Mar 15, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

hello! im a bit new to stock photage, and was curious if anyone knows why these got rejected due to copyright disclaimers?

It is my own photoage with no audio, and I had a couple of other files (just in a different direction) that was approved, and i honestly cant tell why those got accepted and these didnt

TOPICS
Troubleshooting

Views

110

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 3 Correct answers

Community Expert , Mar 15, 2024 Mar 15, 2024

Just guessing: In the first example, the buildings are the primary subject and might require a property release; the Samsung logo in the bottom left of the 2nd example.

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert , Mar 15, 2024 Mar 15, 2024

Video must be legally cleared to use commercially.  You would need to submit signed property releases by the entities that own those identifiable buildings.

 

 

Hope that helps.

 

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert , Mar 15, 2024 Mar 15, 2024

I think you meant that they were rejected due to Intellectual Property. Here's what the rejection reason actually states:

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REFUSAL

Thanks for giving us the chance to consider your image.

During our review, we found that it contains elements that appear to be protected by intellectual property (IP) laws, so we can't accept it into our collection. Elements protected by IP may appear in the image or in the description, title, and/or keywords.
 
As others have said here, the
...

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert ,
Mar 15, 2024 Mar 15, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Just guessing: In the first example, the buildings are the primary subject and might require a property release; the Samsung logo in the bottom left of the 2nd example.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Mar 15, 2024 Mar 15, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Video must be legally cleared to use commercially.  You would need to submit signed property releases by the entities that own those identifiable buildings.

 

 

Hope that helps.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Mar 15, 2024 Mar 15, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I think you meant that they were rejected due to Intellectual Property. Here's what the rejection reason actually states:

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REFUSAL

Thanks for giving us the chance to consider your image.

During our review, we found that it contains elements that appear to be protected by intellectual property (IP) laws, so we can't accept it into our collection. Elements protected by IP may appear in the image or in the description, title, and/or keywords.
 
As others have said here, the buildings themselves might be subject to IP protections; visible signs and logos are always a reason for IP rejection. 
Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Mar 15, 2024 Mar 15, 2024

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

You have IP violation issues. A copyright disclaimer is someting different. You should post the header of the refusal as you got it (in the language you have selected). It will make more sense then. 

 

For the second: if you edit out Samsung, and no other issues are present, you may get that through. 

For the first one, I see no chance.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines