Copy link to clipboard
Copied
In principle, I understand the reasons for the rejection of some of my work.
But in this case, not so much! Could there be an explanation for this?
Maybe the moderator made a mistake? )
I apologize if I wrote the wrong message in the wrong place.
Yes, there are a lot of flawed AI images in the database, but I think Moderators are getting more skilled at detecting flaws and will reject images for flaws that might have gotten accepted months ago.
Generally speaking, the images are too small to make an in-depth analysis of the images. But even at this size, you see multiple issues. For example:
I am not convinced that the cars per se have an IP problem. Except when the radiator figure is a bit more detailed in one of the pictures. The quality issues are, however, correct.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
What reason did Adobe list for the rejection?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
QUALITY ISSUES
🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
From my perspective, these have both IP issues and Quality issues.
The cars look pretty detailed and distinct to me. I'm assuming this to be an IP issue.
These are some of the better A.I. illustrations I've seen, but there are noticeable errors if you study the details. The changes between textures are noticeable in all 3 shots in my opinion. Some of the silhouettes have artefacts around them.
Again, some of the better ones that I've seen. Cheers!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you very much!
Yes, of course there are mistakes.
It seemed to me that this is normal for generating AI.
I have seen accepted images with much bigger problems. For example, pictures on the topic "Boeing AI" 🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Yes, there are a lot of flawed AI images in the database, but I think Moderators are getting more skilled at detecting flaws and will reject images for flaws that might have gotten accepted months ago.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you very much!
I'm very happy with your answers!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
In the first image, the car on the right looks like a Rolls Royce. The neck of the man in the right is messed up.
In the second image, the man on the right has only one large leg and one foot. Overall, the image is quite soft
Third image is also quite soft, and the windows in the car in the left don't quite make sense.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you very much!
I'm very happy with your answers! 🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Glad to be of assistance. Good luck with your future submissions.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The image type is wrong.
Png is to have a transparent background.
Photo and Illustrations must be jpeg.
Requirements for contributing photos and illustrations to Adobe Stock
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I upload a lot of PNGs without a transparent background, they are usually accepted.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I upload a lot of PNGs without a transparent background, they are usually accepted.
By @Olmyntay
It's against the rules.
For PNG files, it's very unusual to have JPEG compression artefacts in the image.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Generally speaking, the images are too small to make an in-depth analysis of the images. But even at this size, you see multiple issues. For example:
I am not convinced that the cars per se have an IP problem. Except when the radiator figure is a bit more detailed in one of the pictures. The quality issues are, however, correct.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Oh, you may be right!
Thank you very much! 🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
With quality, I realized that the quality requirements just increased!
Not long ago, such things were not a problem, given the fact that this is an AI generation
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Although here you can see strange things on the car, but this image was accepted!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I don't understand your question.
Did you steal these still shots from a copyright protected movie?
You can't do that!!! It's illegal.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
these images are created by AI. They can't be from the movie. They are unique. 🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
They are unique. 🙂
By @Olmyntay
==========
AI is trained on actual images. Where those images are sourced is anyone's guess. So probably not as unique as you think. 😉
Start with high resolution diffusions. It costs more to generate high-res images but Stock won't accept anything less.
AI is imperfect especially with fine details. It takes artistic talent to find & fix all AI imperfections. Some people can do it, some can't. Discard any you can't fix.
Generative AI Illustrations could take 1-3 months to be reviewed. Make the most of every AI image you submit. Focus on quality instead of quantity.
Generative AI Submission Requirements:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html
===========
Model/Property Releases:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/model-release.html
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/property-release.html
Good luck.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Reason for rejection is quality.
It was with these images that there were no rights problems.
But three other images from this series are still accepted!
With quality, I realized that the quality requirements just increased!
AI draws the same way as an artist would draw inspired by some idea that he saw in a certain movie. AI does not make a collage of existing images to talk about usage rights!
Thank you very much for your feedback!