Exposure Problem?

[sebman]

I recently rendered some Images with Editorial Design in mind. My first image has been tagged with an "Exposure Problem" and to be honest - i have no clue why that is the case... I wonder if the others will be tagged with the same problem. What do i need to change?

Greetings

Sebastian

[Test Screen Name]

Do you clearly identify each submission as a 3-D render? It is very important NOT to submit them described as photos. Adobe's customers can become very upset.

[Nancy OShea]

I recently rendered some Images with Editorial Design in mind.

=========

@sebman,

All 3 images lack sufficient light, detail and color vibrance.  See links below.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

Better luck next time.  🙂

[sebman]

Thank you for your comments. 

What is strange: one of the 3 Images has been approved and one is still pending.

What i find frustrating with Stock Sites in general is the lack of conformity and clarity of the submitting rules. This is just a gamble and the fact that i have to do a full resubmit if something is wrong isn't helping.

Sure - using AI to categorize and evaluate images is neccessary when handling contributions on a big scale, but it shows it's shortcommings quite clearly.

Greetings

Sebastian

[Abambo]

Sure - using AI to categorize and evaluate images is neccessary when handling contributions on a big scale, but it shows it's shortcommings quite clearly.

By @sebman

Evaluation is done by humans, according to Adobe. The bad news here is that they make mistakes from time to time.

[ricky336]

Hello,

I think the images are dull, so from a photographic point of view, they are indeed underexposed! (Exposure Problem.)