Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
0

Feedback Request: Rejected Image - Vintage Steam Train in Misty Forest (Quality Issues)

New Here ,
Apr 09, 2025 Apr 09, 2025

Hi everyone,

I recently submitted an AI-generated image to Adobe Stock, but it was rejected due to "Quality Issues." I’m hoping to get your feedback on what might have gone wrong and how I can improve it for resubmission.

Image Details:

Title: Vintage steam train traveling through a misty forest on a railway track, with glowing headlights and billowing steam, ideal for historical themes and nostalgic storytelling concepts.
File Name: vintage_steam_train_misty_forest_railway.jpg
File ID: 1389898862
Rejection Reason: Quality Issues (possible issues: exposure, soft focus, excessive filtering, or artifacts/noise)
The image is an AI-generated depiction of a vintage steam train moving through a misty forest, with glowing headlights and billowing steam, aiming for a nostalgic and historical vibe. I’ve attached the image below for your review.

I’m wondering if the rejection might be due to issues like soft focus in the misty areas, exposure problems with the headlights or steam, or perhaps noise/artifacts common in AI-generated images. I’d really appreciate your thoughts on:

What specific quality issues you notice.
Suggestions for improving technical quality (e.g., focus, exposure, noise reduction).
Tips for ensuring atmospheric AI-generated scenes like this meet Adobe Stock’s standards.
Thank you in advance for your time and insights! I’m eager to improve my submissions.

Best,
Deepthi


TOPICS
Contributor critique
140
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 3 Correct answers

Community Expert , Apr 09, 2025 Apr 09, 2025

Nice image. Why the moderator rejected it I cannot say for certain. Personnaly, I feel that it is too dark and that the tracks are not rendered very good. But, I am not sure that that is the reason.

Translate
Participant , Apr 09, 2025 Apr 09, 2025

I think one of the reasons could be that the rails are crooked.

Translate
Community Expert , Apr 11, 2025 Apr 11, 2025

I would focus on the rendering issues. There are a bunch of them:

Abambo_0-1744363839685.png

 

Translate
Community Expert ,
Apr 09, 2025 Apr 09, 2025

Nice image. Why the moderator rejected it I cannot say for certain. Personnaly, I feel that it is too dark and that the tracks are not rendered very good. But, I am not sure that that is the reason.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Participant ,
Apr 09, 2025 Apr 09, 2025

I think one of the reasons could be that the rails are crooked.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Apr 09, 2025 Apr 09, 2025

 

A bit brighter

Ricky336_0-1744209156642.png

 

Ricky336_3-1744209320600.png

Histogram after making the image a bit brighter

 

vs - your image

Ricky336_1-1744209206385.png

Ricky336_2-1744209269808.png

The histogram shows it is a bit dark overall.

So, it can come under an exposure issue!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Apr 11, 2025 Apr 11, 2025
LATEST

I would focus on the rendering issues. There are a bunch of them:

Abambo_0-1744363839685.png

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines