Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Unreported Generative AI content
Are you serious?
The Moderstors do not study your exif data. I think they selected the wrong rejection reason code. It should have been rejected for quality issues due to the excessive noise in the sky.
In addition, there is a white halo around the mountain.
Naturaly, the signature is a no go.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
What is your question? You are not addressing Adobe directly here. This is a community of other stock contributors.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi, I'm sorry for my previous post;
I apologize, please forgive me;
I uploaded this picture 7 years ago on my stock contributor personal space;
this pic was refused with these possible reasons:
- Incorrect use of another artist's name.
- Generative AI content not disclosed.
Really? an image file from 2017, with exif data that show this is a my nikon file, they said me "Incorrect use of another artist's name" or "Generative AI content not disclosed" ... seriously?
How is it possible?
"another artist's name"??? "AI generated content"? in the 2017 ???
Ok, no problem...
I don't understand, but it's ok;
thanks
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I guess we're just confused. I'm not sure why one of the reasons for rejection would have been "use of another artist's name" if it didn't have the watermark, unless you mistakenly uploaded the watermarked file. That said, I certainly don't understand why this would have been construed as AI. I'd simply resubmit if the latter is the case.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The Moderstors do not study your exif data. I think they selected the wrong rejection reason code. It should have been rejected for quality issues due to the excessive noise in the sky.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
In addition, there is a white halo around the mountain.
Naturaly, the signature is a no go.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You should not only include the hints, but also the headline of the refusal, please.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Do you have a question, what was the rejection reason? If an image contains watermarks it will get rejected!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi, thank you for your answer;
there was no watermark in the original image that I have uploaded on my personal stock space (the pic uploaded in this post is just a low res from my personal web site, this is the reason why you see ; if you can read my previous answer, you can understand what I mean...
thanks you
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
"..(the pic uploaded in this post is just a low res from my personal web site, this is the reason why you see my watermark)"...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Low resolution will not cause the white halo.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
What is the relation with Fotolia?
Find more inspiration, events, and resources on the new Adobe Community
Explore Now