Copy link to clipboard
Copied
There have been Creators that upload pictures which are not labeled as AI. They have even been featured in the top artists. So does Adobe not care, that would be sad.
And additional a question for my own content, I wonder if I have to label it as AI when only the background is generated but infront is a graphic design that i spend hours in photoshop on.
[Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]
It is a shame that Ai images get through that are not labeled as such. But I suppose it can happen given that a moderators looks at hundreds of images per day and a contributor either mistakenly or intentionally neglects to correctly label an asset.
As for your question, as I understand it, if generative fill or generative fill are used to edit an image, either to remove or improve something, without actually adding anything new, and it is not the predominant subject of the asset, it does not
...It is no longer necessary to include "Generative AI" in the titles or keywords; however it is necessary to tick the AI checkbox when submitting assets. This change was made about 6 months ago. If a contributor "forgets" to check the box, an automatic algorithm will mark it as an AI asset, though it sometimes gets it wrong and marks some non-AI illustrations as AI.
If you use PS Generative Fill to alter a background it's not necessary to declare the asset as AI; however if you add significant el
...Check here for generative AI guidance: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It is a shame that Ai images get through that are not labeled as such. But I suppose it can happen given that a moderators looks at hundreds of images per day and a contributor either mistakenly or intentionally neglects to correctly label an asset.
As for your question, as I understand it, if generative fill or generative fill are used to edit an image, either to remove or improve something, without actually adding anything new, and it is not the predominant subject of the asset, it does not need to be labeled as AI. In the case as you describe it, however, it appears you are changing the asset fairly dramatically by generating an entirely new and unique background, and should therefore be labeled as AI. At least in my opinion, without actually seeing the asset in question.
Maybe another contributor has a direct link to an official word on the subject from Adobe, but I'm not aware of one myself.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Thank you! In my case I design graphics of symbols and diagrams, and the background is AI generated but made very blurry. So I guess its kinda hard to tell, but probably better to label as AI...
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Check here for generative AI guidance: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/generative-ai-content.html
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
It is no longer necessary to include "Generative AI" in the titles or keywords; however it is necessary to tick the AI checkbox when submitting assets. This change was made about 6 months ago. If a contributor "forgets" to check the box, an automatic algorithm will mark it as an AI asset, though it sometimes gets it wrong and marks some non-AI illustrations as AI.
If you use PS Generative Fill to alter a background it's not necessary to declare the asset as AI; however if you add significant elements to the frame using AI, you must declare it as AI.