Good mornig,I would like to know why my image was rejected, Thank u

[carolined28149984]

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

It's underexposed in general, but there are a few overexposed/blownout areas on and around the creature.

[carolined28149984]

I Jill, Thank you for you're answer, but i don't agree whith the reason, here is picts i found in Adobe stock, and this is - for me -  overexposed picts, so i think i will not understand why my pict was not accepted, but we are not at the same page when we talk about 'overexposed pict',
Have a good day

Caro

[RALPH_L]

True, some get accepted some not. It is good to see that some reviewers are ensuring quality.

Do some exposure corrections and adjust the cropping (space at the top, but the tail is cut off) and resubmit.

[Jill_C]

You don't have to agree with my assessment, but the fact is that the Moderator rejected it, so there are technical issues. We're just trying to help you identify those issues. As @RALPH_L indicated, you may be able to re-edit and resubmit. The fact that you can find other flawed images already in the database doesn't mean that they will accept yours. 

[carolined28149984]

so i just wanted to know how adobe stock works, 
in my pict. there are very small overexposed areas, but i still know what is a good photo and a bad photo, 
mine is not perfect but it is not overexposed unlike to those that I previously posted 
and which are on AS, in short I suspect that it is an AI which makes the selection and not a human moderator,

because my image is supposedly "blurred", and there is no that an AI to confuse the depth of field and a blur,
but that's my business, so I'm going to sell my photos elsewhere!

Have a good day!

[Abambo]

It's RI, not AI (R for real, human intelligence). All moderation is done by humans. And you should really be more critical with your performance. And not taking refusals personal will help a lot. Even contributors working for Adobe get refusals. A refusal is not the end of the world, we all have a nice collection of them.

[Abambo]

Sorry, but this reminds me of my school time. That's not how it works here.

The images you take as an example are quite old and probably from a time where moderation was not that stringent. And your asset has some pretty deficiencies in areas that are important:

You need to either recover the detail or retake the image.