Hello to everyone

[Nat_9868]

Could you provide you expert point of view why this image was rejected. I would really apreciate your feedback as Im new here and would like to understand what is the issue Thank you

[Abambo]

---

@Salman23031396tc4a wrote:

Of course, I’d be happy to help analyze why an image might have been rejected and provide feedback to guide improvements. However, since I can’t view images results by Adobe Stock here, it would be helpful if you could describe key details, elements, or any feedback you may have already received about the image. Additionally, knowing the specific platform or context (e.g., stock photography, social media guidelines, or content standards) could help tailor my feedback.

Common reasons images get rejected often include:

Quality Issues: Low resolution, poor lighting, or blurriness.
Content Guidelines: Violating terms like explicit content, offensive material, or trademarked elements.
Technical Aspects: Improper file format, wrong dimensions, or color inaccuracies.
Composition: Poor framing, excessive noise, or distracting elements.
Model Releases: Missing documentation for identifiable people.
Feel free to share any details or specifics for more tailored feedback!

---

Nonsense answer. 

[Jill_C]

Are you a bot? This AI-influenced response is completely non-responsive to the question.

[daniellei4510]

Grammerly said 66% was AI generated. The "Of course I'd be glad to help" has ChatGPT written all over it. It tends to be overly friendly. 🙂

[Abambo]

I did check for hidden links, but there were none, so I decided to let the response in-place, and just answered. In addition, for the moment, it's the poster's only answer. However, the new, upgraded interface does not tell me any more if there were answers removed. Simplifying is sometimes not the best thing to do. 😂

However, someone else was not that kind, and marked it as spam.

[Abambo]

Just checking a small area of your first (cosmic4) at 100%, I see multiple issues with colour noise: 

Other issues are with texture,  artefacts, random blurs etc.

Cosmic1 has similar issues, but less colour noise: 

[daniellei4510]

Sometimes (or often?), AI likes to have a field day with ornamental and often random, nonsensical embellishments.  

[daniellei4510]

Sorry, forgot to add my example.

[Jill_C]

Many artifacts and odd details are scattered throughout the image.

[Nancy OShea]

What was the reason for rejection?

They look very synthetic and artificial.  I'm not sure what commercial value they hold.

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi @Nat_9868 ,

There's this dark cut in the eyes and the model's left eye is not sharp.

For the second file, the model right eye is not sharp and the left eye has some grains or tiny ulcers.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

[Nat_9868]

Thank you very much

[jacquelingphoto2017]

You are welcome @Nat_9868.

Best wishes

Jacquelin