Help me better understand Intellectual Property Refusal for AI content

[GibbonMonkey]

Greetings everyone!

I generated some simple images of interiors using AI and just a few of them got rejected due to Intellectual Property Refusal. Trying to understand what is the issue to not get more of those refusals, please give me your opinion.

I attached a compressed image of the rejected submission. As you can see there are simply 3 posters and a chair. The only thing I suspect is that the chair has a copyrighted design or something like that. The title is "Contemporary Interior with Three Empty Poster Mock-ups and a Modern Chair", I don't think I could use anything IP related in the tags and the prompt I used to generate the image is just a simple description of the interior and lighting without referencing any artists, styles or companies.

Thank you!

[daniellei4510]

I think the moderator may have picked the wrong reason for refusal by accident, at least for this image. The wordwork between the lengs doesn't make a lot of sense and there is some haloing on some of the braces.

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

Herman Miller owns rights to the infamous Eameses' designs from the 1950s.

https://www.hermanmiller.com/products/seating/side-chairs/eames-shell-chairs/

So I think this was a correct rejection reason.

[Nancy OShea]

The 'Eames Molded Pastic Chair' is iconic, mid-century furniture that's protected by design patent. 

You can't use that for commercial purposes. Sorry.

[daniellei4510]

And what @Nancy OShea said. 🙂

[Jill_C]

Also the shadows to the right side of each frame don't make sense. They should be continuous, not have a light gap within the shadow.