1 Correct answer
Besides the issues marked, all in all, I don't know if this would meet Adobe's standards for what is in demand commercially.
19
Replies
Besides the issues marked, all in all, I don't know if this would meet Adobe's standards for what is in demand commercially.
The inscription is from Lord of the rings..........
By @Eldad Arts
How can you say that it is from the Lord of the Rings? First a "Lord of the Rings" refernce is not allowed. Second, it is still meaningless, even for "Lord of the Rings" standards. Third: it's full of artefacts.
Then what's in demand Commerciall.
By @Eldad Arts
Clean, technically correct images that could be used for a book cover. But else, I would say that a girl or a boy biting in an apple would generate much more sales than this picture. Think simple, your assets need to be easy to generate, all artefacts corrected and useful for a company to put on their flyer or on a poster. Your assets could be used in an amateur fanzine for Lord of the Rings clubs. Nothing that generates sales. The fans will create the generative AI assets themselves. There is no talent needed and for their use, they can even accept worse artefacts than are on your assets.
Don't get me wrong: I love Lord of the Rings, but I would expect better, personally.
I think the watermark came from when I was enhancing the photo
By @Eldad Arts
Well anyhow, the watermark in itself is a refusal reason. But it may even be more: if you are using a free software to "enhance" the picture (not the photo, as it is not a photo), it may well be, that you are not allowed to remove the watermarkl and that you are not allowed to use the picture commercially. That would indeed be a reason to block your account, as you guarantee that you have all the rights to the picture.
Some of the problems I saw, without looking to deep into your asset:
It looks like 2 persons are holding one weapon. What are the ropes hanging down from the arms of the one warrior. The background (of the ropes) is again full of artefacts. You see clearly a lot of artefacts on the right weapon and the hand holding it.
Artefacts and smudged
Nonsense text, full of artefacts.
Nice fantasy images are overfloating the AI-generating generators like Midjourney and others. They are great for personal use but certainly not for stock - neighter the motifs or quality.
By @oleschwander
Fantasy assets by generative AI are for people without talent (for own creations). But it is easy to create own fantasy assets and the resulting quality is what one accepts as being good enough. If I am into fantasy, I learn how to use generative AI. If I'm trying to create the folder for the local fruit seller, then I will be on a tight budget and I may not have the time nor the budget to take my own pictures or generate and correct my own assets. That's the typical customers I would target. (You can exchange fruit seller with any business you want, but the business needs to be small enough, to lack the budget for own assets).
I was the factory photographer of a well-off medium-sized company. We would probably never have bought copies of Lord of the Rings want-be, but we bought various images as stock media and fused them with our own creations. Either too much fantasy or too futuristic won't work. What works are the pictures that you cannot create on your own, or that are cheaper to source from stock.
We used, as an example, the picture of a child playing with a rocket, for the cover of our innovation handbook. There's no room for elves and gobblins and wizzards (well, wizzards may be! 🙂 ) in our company.
Hi @Eldad Arts
To add to what's highlighted, there is no details in some of the dark areas. For example, if you were to print this picture, what would print out as the rear of this horse?
Best wishes
Jacquelin
AdChoices