I just wanna know about the reason of Rejection

[Gexx]

Can someone explain why my images not accepted? Its a generative ai image, I checked all the box for generative ai tools. Just want to know clearly the reason of rejection. Thank you 

[Ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Hello,

One quick suggestion is to look at your colour tone. They are looking a bit green (1,2&3) and have exposure issues - maybe try to balance that out a bit. The subjects are a bit dark. Bring more light onto their faces.

[Gexx]

Oh okey. I'll adjust the Exposure for the next ai images.

About the color.

So it means, Adobe doesn't accept the greenish color? In the prompt I type "Kodak Portra 400", so thats why the color look a little bit green. So, does Adobe not accept such colors like that? Does Adobe only accept more natural colors? Is it only for ai?

because some of my submitted photos (not ai), aren't natural. I change the color, like more orange or more blue and green.

[Abambo]

So, does Adobe not accept such colors like that? Does Adobe only accept more natural colors? Is it only for ai?

By @Gexx

The white balance of the asset should be correct. A neutral grey should stay neutral grey. The buyer can then apply the colour corrections they prefer for the effects they need. You should look at your assets as semifinished products, that can still be mended to match the look and feel that the buyer requires.

[MliO111 · Accepted solution]

You CANT use ANY brand names (Kodak Portra 400 or Gucci). Its 100% illegal. I already asked about it here and different forums all over the world. You need DELETE EVERYTHING and make promt again without this words and upload again. Otherwise one day you can be blocked.

[Gexx]

Thank you!!

okey. I learned something from you. Thank you. I didn't notice about the Kodak Portra before.

[daniellei4510]

And there's actually no point in doing so. AI ignores all that extraneous stuff. AI has no idea what any of those details mean.

[Gexx]

Oh. Forgot this.

Thank you for replying my post. I appreciate it. Thank you so much!!

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

Several of these are too dark and need slight level adjustments to boost highlights.

With AI, you really must closely examine every detail at 100-300% zoom.  It might be look passable at a glance from a distance but up close, rendering mistakes become more obvious -- especially facial features, skin, hair, hands, jewelry, clothing, backgrounds, etc...

[Gexx]

Thank you.

yes, i think i need to adjust the exposure for the next ai image.

I always zooming when i edit the images. But i thought some part looks like a natural for me. Like human hair, some natural lights. Just like that. Sometimes i compared to a real photos too. But yeah, maybe i miss some part of them to remove it.

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Check the histogram of the pictures:

When you look at the asset, you see immediately, that the light coming from the windows is too dull, has no dynamic. That gets confirmed by the histogram, where you see that whites and parts of the highlights are missing.

A simple correction of the exposure make the asset correctly exposed.

[Gexx]

Next i need to check the histogram again about ai images.

but what if i submit the image with dark themes? Is that okay? 

[daniellei4510]

Only if the histogram is within reasonable limits. If someone is buying your image for print and the blacks are too black, no ink or paper (other than very expensive inks or highly reflective papers) could reproduce those deep blacks. A dark theme can still be dark without exceeding reasonable limts.

[Abambo]

Also with dark themes your histogram should spawn the whole range. The peak will tend to the left.

[daniellei4510]

Some of these are close, but could use a lot of clean-up around the hair. Upscaling can often over-sharpen hairs. 

[Gexx]

Wow, thank you so much!! @daniellei4510 

Now, i learned something new.

On the first image that "Woman in the Church", the sign that you gave the red box with text "is this a wrist?",  i never see it as a wrist. I thought it was a part of hair, you know that some hair sticking out of the hair tie and affected by bokeh effect of the camera. And i was thinking it's a good image. But, now i know it doesn't.

Yeah, i think next i will check more detail and remove unnecessary things. Especially, the hair part.

thank you so much!! 

[daniellei4510 · Accepted solution]

The so-called "wrist" may or may not have been the reason for rejection. A moderator will not spend time scouring the entire image from corner to corner before deciding to reject it. It only takes one small error to be found by the moderator to mark it as rejected. Then they move on to the next asset.

[Gexx]

Aahh...

I understand now. I need to double check again on editing later. I need be more careful and need to check more detail. Thank you!! I appreciate that.

[daniellei4510]

I've pretty much learned to avoid ornate jewelry and accessories altogether. The craftsmanship required of something like this in real life is always lacking. AI tries, but usually fails. 

[Gexx]

Okey. This is new for me too.

i think i need to avoid that too. But, what if i submitted the ai image with ornate jewelry and it's a anime or cartoon or like 3D render? 

[Nancy OShea]

The more complex the image is, the more opportunities AI has for making blunders. 

I don't know if this is resource issue or a memory problem.  But simple images usually produce better results.

If you're good at making composites, in theory you can combine AI with other AI or natural images.

[daniellei4510]

Clothing is poorly rendered in a few places.

[Gexx]

And again, I thought this looks so natural. It safe too submit.

if i edit all the images that got rejected, can i submit again? Is that okay?

[daniellei4510]

Of course. Submitting edited images is allowed.

[daniellei4510 · Accepted solution]

One more...why it's sometimes important to view AI images at 200% or more. The iris on the left looks fine, but not the right. Eyelashes also need some work.