I want to know common reasons for AI generated image rejection

[Muhammad31603733gubv]

I have read a lot about the rejection reasons of photos uploaded on Adobe Stock. But I think there are some other reasons specific to AI generated art that can get my images rejected. Can anyone help me in summarising the same?

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

Read through some of the other posts here in the forum. There have been many rejected AI examples posted here. Typical reasons include, blurriness, inaccurate physiosology on human and animal subjects (too many or not enough fingers, legs, etc.), artifacts, under or overexposure, poorly drawn details, jagged lines, details that don't make sense - tables with too few legs or misplaced legs, unfinished lines, etc.

[Muhammad31603733gubv]

What could be the possible reason for the rejection of these two?

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

Zoom in past 100% and you'll see that the warrior is rather blurry, particularly his head. In the car image, "Dodge" is a protected trademark, the aerial isn't attached to the car, and the mirror on the left doesn't look like the opposite mirror. You should edit out the license plate number rather than leaving the nonsensical characters shown there.

[Muhammad31603733gubv]

thanks a lot, sir.

[Abambo]

Look also to the left border of the warrior picture. You need to crop that "shadow" out of the picture. As for your car, even without looking at it in detail, you see geometric shortcomings that should get this one rejected. The most ovious are the side mirrors.

[daniellei4510 · Accepted solution]

I think it's becoming more and more difficult to have AI images accepted as the moderators become more familiar with their potential shortcomings. I think in the car example, the headlights and parkting lights are a little wonky in terms of the detailing and not being perfect circles . But my biggest concern with it...no driver. 🙂

[Jill_C]

Good point! Not exactly the type of car you would expect to see "driverless"!

[Abambo]

No ghostriders? 🙃