2 Correct answers
Moderators always give a reason for a rejection. Some images on Adobe get rejected that other sites accept, possibly because Adobe's standards are higher or at least very specific. Moderators that reject images "to reduce their work" would not be working for Adobe for very long, since they would be getting paid while not providing Adobe with a means to afford paying them by maintaining a database of quality assets. And the amount of time it takes to reject an images no doubt takes the same amoun
...
Keep in mind that if Moderators don't approve and add saleable images to the Adobe Stock database, Adobe doesn't make any sales; nor will they continue to attract new Buyers who are always in search of fresh material. Therefore, your assertion that reviewers "reject to reduce their work" is ridiculous and completely unfounded. It takes them just as long to reject an image as to accept one; and I suppose Adobe keeps track of the accept/reject rates of each Reviewer to know whether their work is w
...
25
Replies
AdChoices