Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I'm submitting almost 250+ images everyday and almost 120 or 100 images got declined by Adobe is there any impact on my account due to images declaration for example is there my account will block bcz of images declaration usually there's quality issues and soft focus issues occurs help me plzz will my account will ban due to it or not??
250+ per day? I assume these are AI images? I consider myself having a good day if I manage to edit and submit 6 to 12 images. So yeah, that's around a 50% rejection rate give or take, and I don't know if it would result in a ban, but you might very well be pushing your luck at that rate.
You will need to lower your rejection rate, be checking your assets before submitting. At some stage, Adobe may well decide that it is not worth to have assets submitted by you. Nobody knows the threshold, but for somewhere a rejection rate of 50% is not sustained.
Slow down and inspect each image carefully, editing those that have flaws and discarding those that cannot be fixed. You cannot possibly be spending enough time on each of those 250 images to ensure that they are of the highest quality. If you spent 5 minutes on each, that would be nearly 21 hours per day! Obviously, you can't claim that you are focused on submitting only high quality images.
A 73% rejection rate is much too high. We don't know the exact rejection threshold at which Adobe wil
...Focus less on quantity and more on quality. A high rejection rate is not good for anyone, least of all Adobe Stock who must pay staff to Reveiw your assets.
Select 5-10 of your best images after editing. Compare with current Stock inventory to ensure it's as good or better than what Stock has. Remove all images you're unsure about. That should help reduce your rejection rate.
Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects. See below
...Copy link to clipboard
Copied
250+ per day? I assume these are AI images? I consider myself having a good day if I manage to edit and submit 6 to 12 images. So yeah, that's around a 50% rejection rate give or take, and I don't know if it would result in a ban, but you might very well be pushing your luck at that rate.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You will need to lower your rejection rate, be checking your assets before submitting. At some stage, Adobe may well decide that it is not worth to have assets submitted by you. Nobody knows the threshold, but for somewhere a rejection rate of 50% is not sustained.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
No one knows the threshold. But for getting one reward at some time, you needed to have a rejection rate of less than 50%. So anything above 50% is considered as bad.
But at your pace, you can't objectively check all the assets thoroughly, and I fear that a certain moment your old sins will take over. We have seen, that, especially people submitting countless assets, do not always put the needed work into curing the defects, and even if they get accepted, they still contain multiple issues, that make customers complain about the assets. Furthermore, keywords may not be correct or misleading, which may also lead to account suspension.
Don't get me wrong, this is only a summary from the reports of suspended users. It may well be that your assets are better than the average. I won't judge them, without having seen any of them. But at a pace of 250 a day, you can't really take care of every asset, IMHO.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
okay thank you very much i always get help from your answers thank you very much!!!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You're welcome.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
sir i have one more question!!
i'm new here in adobe can you share some info about which images are sale most here and which thig i will put infront of me while generating images for exmple... which type of imags i will create which will sale most here in illustration and photos types...!!!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Look at the Insights https://contributor.stock.adobe.com/en/insights/best/contributors and check here: https://helpx.adobe.com/support/stock-contributor.html, what are buyers looking for.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
and in the future, in the future, to find the best place to post your message, use the list here, https://community.adobe.com/
p.s. i don't think the adobe website, and forums in particular, are easy to navigate, so don't spend a lot of time searching that forum list. do your best and we'll move the post (like this one has already been moved) if it helps you get responses.
<"moved from using the community">
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
<"moved from using the community">
By @kglad
That is weird, as this discussion was in the correct forum.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
someone moved it.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Slow down and inspect each image carefully, editing those that have flaws and discarding those that cannot be fixed. You cannot possibly be spending enough time on each of those 250 images to ensure that they are of the highest quality. If you spent 5 minutes on each, that would be nearly 21 hours per day! Obviously, you can't claim that you are focused on submitting only high quality images.
A 73% rejection rate is much too high. We don't know the exact rejection threshold at which Adobe will conclude that your submissions are costing them too much time to moderate. The moderators are having to look at 4 of your images to find 1 that is acceptable. That's not good for Adobe; nor is it good for you.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Focus less on quantity and more on quality. A high rejection rate is not good for anyone, least of all Adobe Stock who must pay staff to Reveiw your assets.
Select 5-10 of your best images after editing. Compare with current Stock inventory to ensure it's as good or better than what Stock has. Remove all images you're unsure about. That should help reduce your rejection rate.
Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects. See below for more tips.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
AI can't replace real artists. It makes far too many mistakes and it's not smart enough to know what mistakes it makes to correct them. That's your job.
It requires talent & skill to create commercial-ready artwork from machine generated images. Midjourney can run 100+ diffusion cycles before I have 5 decent images to work with. It's that prone to failures & the costs add up. Then the real work begins in Photoshop, etc...
I think it's easier to manually create artwork from AI inspirations. It might take longer but I'm making a better product.