Image rejected - quality issues

[Annika5D1E]

Hi :),
I´d really appreciate some feedback on why theses images might have been rejected because of quality issues.
Thanks in advance!

[Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

[Jill_C]

AGP_9730.jpg - this is not a well composed image. The blurry lef in the foreground is particularly distracting.

[Jill_C]

AGP_9640.jpg - composition is also a problem here. No object is completely in the frame. These appear to be cellphone snapshots taken at a rummage sale. I question whether there is any commercial appeal to such images.

[Abambo]

9706 is quite noisy. It is also not well composed. 

There is also with all of your pictures a missing commercial value, but that would be a different refusal.

[RALPH_L]

I agree, composure is a problem. 

[Henrik Heigl]

Hi,

here are my perspective:

AGP_9661.jpg - not good composition, not sharp on the edges
AGP_9661.jpg - not sharp, no Commercial value
AGP_9640.jpg - not sharp, no Commercial value
AGP_9706.jpg - not sharp on the edges, no Commercial value

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html

Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html

See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html

And especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

In addition it can help to read about Keywords:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/titles-and-keyword.html

[Ricky336]

Hello,

Your pictures have too much clutter; your subject is not clear. You need to read about composition. This is really important!!

Composition is part of the quality standards.

Composition:
https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/photography/discover/photo-composition.html

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi @Annika5D1E ,

The first file has a white balance issue. It is slightly blue. The blue is more obvious in the shadows.

I believe the depth of field of the first file is shallow. While removing texts from the objects is not a quality issue, it is another reason for refusal if the submission is for commercial licensing and the texts poses an IP problem in which case you need to remove them.

The second file is also slightly blue. It would have been better if you had caught all the carriage without the leg in the forefront and a wider crop at the handle.

The third file is underexposed. It has a focus issue which is visible when zoom in at 100%. Also, I cannot identify a subject in this picture, thus a composition issue.

The fourth too has a white balance issue. It is slightly blue and the depth of field is too shallow.

Best wishes

Jacquelin