Image rejected

[Trai Collective]

AI Image was rejected, just curious on your opinion on why it was so. 

Thank you.

[daniellei4510]

What was the reason given for rejection?

[Trai Collective]

Possible reasons:

- Non compliant use of another artist’s name.

- Undeclared Generative AI Content.

- Content not compliant with overall guidelines

[daniellei4510]

I recall a similar event that happened in Portland, OR during protests a few years back. I assume you made no direct reference to a real event in your title or keywords? That would be a violation of #3.

[Jill_C]

The female looks like an AI image. Did you declare it as such?

[Trai Collective]

I declared it as AI as all of my content , title was "Girl walking down the stree, NYC" - Could it be the NYC tag? Since it's a generated image and not in NYC

[Jill_C]

It might not meet the nudity guidelines, which are rather subjective. It also could have been rejected for quality issues because her left hand is malformed and her right arm appears to be longer than her left arm.

I wouldn't put "NYC" in the title, though I suppose it could be a tag. The title should be much more descriptive, such as "Nude Young Woman Viewed From Behind, Walking down the middle of a busy street in New York City"  But the lack of an inadequate title isn't necessarily a reason for rejection.  

[Trai Collective]

Thank you for your reply, I dont think it was the hand since it was rejected much faster that another image i uploaded by mistake which has a much more glaring issue. It was rejected in about 12 hours.

[Jill_C]

The speed of rejection is irrelevant. Moderators only review the images as they come up in the queue assigned to them. 

[Abambo]

Thank you for your reply, I dont think it was the hand since it was rejected much faster that another image i uploaded by mistake which has a much more glaring issue. It was rejected in about 12 hours.

By @Trai Collective

A moderator will look about 10s to your image to decide on the rejection, it is irrelavant if the assets waits an hour or 8 weeks in the queue. 

My five cents to this:

• the nudity is a reason for getting a "Non-compliant image" refusal. 
• mentioning NYC is also a reason for that refusal. As an generative AI asset, it would be difficult to pin down the town. The Yellow Cab is an indication, but that could earn you an IP violation. 

[daniellei4510]

I can almost guarantee that that was the issue. "walking down the street in a large metropolitan city" might be the way to go instead. 

[Trai Collective]

Thank you

[Abambo]

The reason is "non-compliant image".

The text is stock text and may not directly relate to your precise issue.

Nb it is important always to give us the refusal reason. It helps a lot to avoid unnecessary guessing.

[daniellei4510]

OK, now that I'm home and reviewing this on my computer instead of my laptop at my local bar with people looking over my shoulder, I have to agree with @Jill_C about the extra length of the arm on the right. I think a little back and forth using Liquify in photoshop could fix that issue.

[photorebelle]

If I may add something, your image should be in jpg and not in png.

[Trai Collective]

Why not png?

[daniellei4510]

pngs should only be submitted when the image is on a transparent background.

[Abambo]

Because PNG is reserved for assets with transparency. Adobe is not currently enforcing that rule very actively, but there are examples that users got banned afterward for not following the rules.

[Ricky336]

Hello,

My 2 cents worth; I think the main issue is the nudity, and probably some keyword(s), for example - NYC.

Copilot says this about NYC:

The concept of copyright can be quite fascinating! Let’s explore it in the context of New York City (NYC).

First, it’s essential to understand that copyright primarily protects original works of authorship. These works can include literary, artistic, musical, and other creative expressions. However, not everything falls under copyright protection. For instance:

1. Trademark vs. Copyright:

   • The famous “I ♥ New York” logo is protected by trademark, not copyright.
   • Trademarks safeguard symbols, logos, and phrases associated with specific brands or organizations. In this case, the logo represents NYC as a brand, promoting tourism and pride.
   • Copyright, on the other hand, covers original artistic works, such as paintings, literature, music, and software.

2. Copyright Basics:

   • Copyright law grants creators exclusive rights to their works, allowing them to control how their creations are used.
   • These rights include the right to reproduce, distribute, perform, and display the work.
   • To qualify for copyright protection, a work must be original and fixed in a tangible medium (e.g., written down, recorded, or saved digitally).

3. NYC Content and Copyright:

   • The content on official NYC websites, such as the New York City Department of City Planning, is typically protected by copyright.
   • However, the NYC Department of City Planning allows users to print copies of the information for per...¹.
   • If you’re interested in specific NYC records, you can explore the Copyright Public Records Portal maintained by the U.S. Copyright Office².

The Yellow taxi cab could also be another issue of trademark as it is well known.

And:

Yes, the yellow taxi cabs in New York City are indeed trademarked. Let me provide you with some details:

• Medallions and Licensing: Yellow cabs in New York City are regulated by the Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC). By law, there are 13,587 taxis in the city, and each taxi must have a medallion affixed to it. These medallions are auctioned by the city and are transferable on the open market by licensed broke...¹.

• Exclusive Rights: Yellow cabs are the only vehicles that have the right to pick up street-hailing and prearranged passengers anywhere in New York City. This exclusivity is part of the TLC regulations¹.

• Taxicab Markings: The markings on yellow cabs are standardized. They include the iconic yellow color, the taxi medallion number, and other identifying features. The TLC ensures that these markings are consistent across all yellow cabs in the city².

• New Taxi Logos: The TLC has recently approved a fare increase that will require new taxi stickers with updated logos. These logos are designed by a firm called Smart Design and will be seen on yellow cabs in the near f...³.

So, the yellow taxi cabs in NYC are not only a familiar sight on the streets but also a well-regulated and trademarked part of the city’s transportation system! :oncoming_taxi::statue_of_liberty:

I personally don't think there is any outstanding issue with the length of the arm with the woman.

[daniellei4510]

There's a good deal of nudity on Adobe Stock (almost half a million results for the search term "nudes"), a lot of which is much more revealing and explicit than what is seen here. I know buyers can filter out adults-only content, but I've always been surprised that Adobe doesn't offer the option for the contributor to do that themselves in advance when submitting. But yes, it's certainly possible that a moderator with more modest sensibilities may have nixed this for that reason.

[Abambo]

NYC is not protected. And the yellow cabs are not either.

[Nancy OShea]

Stock is a global service. In many countries, this would be banned for nudity (middle east, religion-based government restrictions).

Read about non-compliance below.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/submission-guidelines.html

[Festive_epicness157F]

There's somethin wront with the stripes in the street, the yellow cab is much too long at the rear and the door handles are not in line, the curbstone is wrong/missing at the corner, the 'Mercedes' has three door handles, the hands are poorly rendered.

[Abambo]

Quality issues, not non-compliant issues. But it's always possible that there are quality issues with an image, and the wrong rejection reason got selected.