Images got rejected - quality issues

[Laurin28188507dbf1]

Can you please help me why the following images got rejected and what i need to do to prevent this from happening again using AI generative images?

Thanks in advance.

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

In each of the animal images, composition is an issue because parts of the animal are cropped off. 

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

Besides the clipping issues mentioned by @Jill_C 

• Octopus eyes are bizarre.  They normally have small slits for eyes because they are very sensitive to light.
• Cheetah's spots are blurry.
• Flamingos have no feet.  If standing in something, there's no context for it here.

AI synthesis is imperfect with details.  Inspect AI art carefully and fix what you can.

[Abambo]

This is wrong:

Compare this to real flamingos:

(Aliasing)

[Laurin28188507dbf1]

[DUPLICATE POST MERGED WITH ORIGINAL TOPIC BY MODERATOR.]

Can you help me why these images got rejected using generativ AI? Thanks in advance 🙂

   

[George_F]

In general if you view in to 100% view in Lightroom/Photoshop you'll see the details are very soft and blurry with these.

The cheetah may have too shallow of a depth of field to be accepted, but I can't tell with the details being so soft.  

The goat image had several random spots/artefacts that are common with AI photos that are on one hand creative, but on another hand very likely considered a technical imperfection by Adobe.  The goat photo also had some aliasing/jagged edges when zoomed in, which is common with upscaling.

I hope that helps!

[Test Screen Name]

Did you upscale? You must not.

[Abambo]

Besides being cut-off, this cheetah has multiple errors in such a small space:

Ibex: Aliasing and compression artefacts:

Multiple errors on your octopus as shown in your second post with more or less the same assets.