Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
0

Incorrect AI Label on Manually Created Videos

New Here ,
Feb 25, 2025 Feb 25, 2025

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I uploaded several videos to Adobe Stock, all created in Blender without AI. Two of these videos were marked as AI-generated and rejected. Since there are no forms available to appeal this, I am posting it here in hopes of receiving a coherent response.

I don’t mind having two videos rejected, but labeling something I manually created as AI-generated is offensive.

chrome_uJCeJ8p6My.pngblender_wVOBD5A1zL.pngblender_z4v4l2NeEf.png

[Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

 

TOPICS
Troubleshooting

Views

60
Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 2 Correct answers

Community Expert , Feb 25, 2025 Feb 25, 2025

Indeed, the Moderators sometimes make mistakes in their assumptions regarding generative AI. Since there is no way to dispute their findings, it has been suggested that you can resubmit with a property release attached indicating that you are the sole creator and the means by which you created the asset.

Votes

Translate
Community Expert , Feb 25, 2025 Feb 25, 2025

Moderators are humans, and when your videos are even slightly similar to what generative AI seems to looklike, they will mark your videos as such. Resubmit with a property release, stating that your video is 3D generated. You can use the digitally signed form, where you are the artist and the property owner.

 

Incidentally: there is still a chance that the moderator gave the wrong refusal reason, and that they meant quality issues or even something different.

 

Good luck with the resubmit. It

...

Votes

Translate
Community Expert ,
Feb 25, 2025 Feb 25, 2025

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Indeed, the Moderators sometimes make mistakes in their assumptions regarding generative AI. Since there is no way to dispute their findings, it has been suggested that you can resubmit with a property release attached indicating that you are the sole creator and the means by which you created the asset.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 25, 2025 Feb 25, 2025

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Moderators are humans, and when your videos are even slightly similar to what generative AI seems to looklike, they will mark your videos as such. Resubmit with a property release, stating that your video is 3D generated. You can use the digitally signed form, where you are the artist and the property owner.

 

Incidentally: there is still a chance that the moderator gave the wrong refusal reason, and that they meant quality issues or even something different.

 

Good luck with the resubmit. It looks like a nice work. 😉

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines