Just curious to know the reason of rejection for this picture

[Kedar5C44]

[J E L]

I haven’t looked closely at your shot for technical reasons but the rejection is likely because you show the logo and trademark of the coffee brand.

[Nancy OShea]

What did Adobe Stock say was the reason for rejection?  For example, Technical Problems, Intellectual Property, Aesthetic/Commercial Appeal, something else?

I feel the composition is a bit cluttered.  Also the lighting could be better, there's too much shadow over the coffee cup.  And that NESCAFÉ package has to go for obvious IP reasons. 

====================

See links below.

• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustr...
• https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/how-to/tips-stock-image-acceptance.html

Better luck with your next submission. 🙂

[Abambo]

Your picture is out of focus, contains colour noise and luminary noise

...and is a little dark. Any of those would lead to a refusal.

What you absolutely need to consider is to get rid of any make, logo or other mark that may be protected. Here I see clearly the Nescafé logo. That disqualifies the picture for IP reasons.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

[ricky336]

Hello,

The composition is definitely cluttered I think! Less is more. The saucer could be in focus I think, and the focus on the cup and cinnamon sticks doesn't seem to be sharp, so maybe more DOF. The lighting as @Nancy OShea has mentioned also isn't good.