Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
1

long time disapproval of imagessss

New Here ,
Jul 01, 2023 Jul 01, 2023

The pictures I have uploaded for 18 days are being reviewed and awaiting approval. If you're going to keep the pictures we uploaded waiting for so long, why should we upload pictures to this site? The strange thing is, they don't tell me how much longer to wait. He says it will be reviewed in 1-2 business days. It's been 18 days. I don't think I will upload pictures or designs to this site again. good luck everybody

TOPICS
Contributor critique
2.0K
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 5 Correct answers

Community Expert , Jul 01, 2023 Jul 01, 2023

Adobe is moderating 500k pictures a week. You need to have to wait. If you don't participate, that's no problem, but I do not see a reason to complain about slow moderation, as moderation is taking your pictures in the order they have been submitted. If you have to wait, you have people having submitted before you.

Translate
Community Expert , Jul 01, 2023 Jul 01, 2023

Due to the huge influx of Generative AI assets, the queue for illustrations has grown to 2 months or more.

Translate
Community Expert , Jul 01, 2023 Jul 01, 2023

For an asset that will be offered for sale for many years, I don't think a few weeks is too long to wait.  In fact, a license just sold for an asset that had last sold in 2020 for me.

 

Nothing about Stock is fast in my opinion.  I just don't think these wait times matter much for most of us.

Translate
Community Expert , Jul 01, 2023 Jul 01, 2023

1. Stock is a business, not social media. 

2. Stock sells assets everyday from current inventory of 300+ million assets.

3. Whether your assets are reviewed this month or next  doesn't matter to Stock.It all comes out in the end.

4. What matters is your submission vs rejection rate and number of sales (downloads).

 

High performing contributors with low rejection rates may get reviewed quicker.  At least that's the prevailing theory.  Contributor accounts with poor track records are eventually

...
Translate
Community Expert , Jul 02, 2023 Jul 02, 2023

Hi @Black Garage T-shirt ,

There are no place on the Adobe website that shows that assets gets moderated within 3 days. The shortest time published is 5 business days and that applies to photographs only. My understanding is Generative AI takes up to 3 months. PNG and Vector falls between. From your complains I assume you have one of the two newest formats in the queue waiting for review. That's how it is now and will be until the rush generative AI upload reduces.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

Translate
Explorer ,
Jul 26, 2023 Jul 26, 2023

At the moment, I have photos (captured with a real camera) that have been in the queue for 7-12 days 🙂

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 26, 2023 Jul 26, 2023

Adobe doesn't consider it spamming to upload hundreds of AI images at a time; however, they do consider it spamming when a Contributor uploads many similars. As you're aware, they implemented a cap in the number of assets that a single account can have under review, though this cap varies by factors that have not been revealed. I think accounts are being blocked when quality issues are found among the previously approved assets, perhaps due to a complaint from a Buyer. 

Congratulations on your string of successful submissions. I think there's also a chance that Adobe prioritizes review for quality-oriented Contributors such as yourself who have had a high acceptance rate. 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 26, 2023 Jul 26, 2023

That's what baffles me. I can't imagine how someone can submit hundreds of AI images on a regular basis and NOT have them contain hundreds of quality issues. In my experience as an AI designer and retired photographer, AI actually requires as much if not more editing time than photographs. Not to mention the added steps required to upscale AI images while maintaining a high level of quality. Then again, the fact that I specialize in photo realistic AI and not robots or aneme or what have you may have something to do with the fact my AI requires more editing than average.

Oh, well. It is what it is. I have over 400 images waiting for review, with the oldest at this point being around two months. And, like other AI contributors (and photographers), it took a good two months for my first group of images to be accepted (and rejected, as I've learned a lot during those first few months of submitting AI). My motto now is: One is only as good at creating AI as the number of results one consigns to the trash. 😉


Forum Volunteer | One thing I've learned from these forums is how to spell algorithm.
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jul 26, 2023 Jul 26, 2023
LATEST
quote

That's what baffles me. I can't imagine how someone can submit hundreds of AI images on a regular basis and NOT have them contain hundreds of quality issues.


By @daniellei4510

People pretend being able to do that at a rejection rate in the low percentage range.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines