More Intelectual properties questions

[Verbbaitum]

I don't understand how the attached images were refused because of intellectual property concerns. It can't be the lure becasue the one of hte perch and the lure was accepted. I attached teh apprpreiate model release.

[Test Screen Name]

The jacket is easily identifiable (by it's maker). There's also a branded lanyard or similar.

[Verbbaitum]

But you can't read it so it's not identifiable.

[George_F]

Is this the jacket?

https://www.windrider.com/products/boreas_ice_fishing_suit

[Abambo]

---

@Verbbaitum wrote:
But you can't read it so it's not identifiable.

---

You can read part of it. Photoshop it, as well as the logo on the cap. There is also something written on the ribbon. I do not think that the cloth design is so special, that it will earn a refusal by its design.

[RALPH_L]

It may have been the lure but I think all of the photos have technical problems.

[Nancy OShea]

Various Reviewers notice different things.  Just because your image got passed one Stock Reviewer does not mean it will pass ALL Reviewers. 

1. IMO, the Lure is a problem.  Lure makers are very protective of their designs.

2 & 3. The knit cap and jacket have identifying marks that could probably be removed with Photoshop.

But as @RALPH_L said, there are some technical problems that should be corrected, too.

Better luck with your next submission.

[Test Screen Name]

The test is: could ANYONE identify it. If I was the manufacturers of that jacket, it would be very clear that it was my jacket - and I would be talking to the lawyers. Adobe will not take even the smallest chance, nor can you.