My AI Generated Image Got Rejected for Not Meeting Quality Standard

[GAPD]

Can anyone identify the issues with these images and suggest how I can improve the quality? I have attached the submitted images. Here is the rejection message:

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Forget about your 4 first assets. They are of no use. Your design experiment has quality issues like this (and many more): 

In addition, you should not add text to your assets. The buyer can use their interpretation of the assets, and that in their language. 

As a side note: why is everyone finger pointing? 

[Abambo]

In addition "Six Sigma" is a service mark. You can't use that for stock. It would get refused on IP grounds.

[GAPD]

[daniellei4510]

"Yes, Six Sigma is a trademark owned by Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC. The trademark was registered by Motorola in 1993. While the term is widely used and understood, the trademark is still held by Motorola. "

[Abambo]

What do you want to prove? That there are many 6 Sigma assets in the database that are all violation Motorola's IP? If the moderators do not know that 6 Sigma is a service mark, they will accept the term. By checking the term, because I strongly suspected spam, I found out that it is a service mark from Motorola. I have no idea if they enforcing that. 

However, even if Adobe would not strike you with an IP violation, the design is substandard. Anyone can write Six Sigma on a black background, and they would do that faster than serching for your assets.

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

This graphic seems to be so specific as to be useless as a generic stock image. Also, it's too simple. Anyone with minimal skill could design this. And there are also the spelling errors...

[GAPD]

[Jill_C]

What does this screen print represent ?

[GAPD]

Very simple images are there in adobe express

[Abambo]

Very simple images are there in adobe express

By @GAPD

They are in stock. Adobe Express allows you to license them under a limited licence, if you are a Premium Adobe Express user. They are more complex than yours. And they have probably spell-checked the terms. 

[daniellei4510]

With all those spelling errors, I'm guessing ChatGPT.