My friend and I are doing Ai images same way, yet his are accepted and mine are declined.

[URRM Inc.365564128y1j]

My friend and I are doing Ai images same way, yet his are accepted and mine are declined.

Why is that? 

What is wrong with this image, are moderators lazy and accept/deny things on percent of images that are approved before I was doing with new program or something? 

It's really rude to disrespect hours of work, in only 10 sec/ 1 min... 

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

My friend and I are doing Ai images same way, yet his are accepted and mine are declined.

Why is that? 

What is wrong with this image, are moderators lazy and accept/deny things on percent of images that are approved before I was doing with new program or something? 

It's really rude to disrespect hours of work, in only 10 sec/ 1 min... 

By @URRM Inc.365564128y1j

Your images are too small to check. Post one of your images and tell us the refusal reason, and we will look into this.

But as a general matter: a refusal is not rude and not targeted at you, it's because there are errors in your asset.

[URRM Inc.365564128y1j]

[Abambo]

1. Artefacts.
2. Errors in the eye.
3. Unnatural skin structure, that are artefacts.
4. Hair has not enough structure.
5. Skin has absolutely no structure
6. Eye leashes are "cut off"

The nose ring is not correct, the left part of the nose is unexplainably out of focus.

The teeth are not well drawn, the lips disappear into the skin.

Hair is odd:

Chain rendering errors:

What does she have in the nose? If that is to be a jewel, it's badly rendered. The nose a too blurry.

The eyes are not correct. The pupil is missing. The whole rendering is incorrect (eye leaches, white of the eyes, …)

Rendering errors in the hair, missing structure and when you have structure, it does not look correct.

The mouth crease is poorly drawn.

The cat has similar issues:

(I could continue like this all the way. All screen copies have been taken by checking the assets at 100%. Every one of these errors should lead to a refusal for quality issues)

[URRM Inc.365564128y1j]

Okay, thanks for taking your time, may God bless you.

[Abambo]

You're welcome.

[daniellei4510]

These aren't necessarily ALL the issues, but here are a few.

[Jill_C]

Moderators don't reject images out of laziness or rudeness; they reject them when they see a flaw or something that violates one of the Adobe guidelines. Rather than taking rejections as a personal insult, you should regard each rejection as a learning opportunity. Once you learn to recognize the errors in your images before you submit them, your acceptance rate will improve significantly.

Show us these images at full size, and you'll receive useful feedback.

[daniellei4510]

Moderators do not reject images out of "rudeness." They reject them if they notice errors, regardless of how much time you spend creating or (most importantly) editing your results before you submit them. 

[daniellei4510]

Writing prompt after prompt after prompt after prompt is not "hours of work." Editing the results of those prompts are. If you wish to be successful at stock, you need to review your images from corner to corner and edit them as needed.

[Abambo]

I doubt that you can edit the assets presented here to a point that they get accepted without recreating the assets. The generation quality is simply not good enough. There are errors everywhere.

[JuliO111]

Abambo, you are very right. Its just not quality promt. If you have quality one - you dont need edit much or you doesnt need to edit at all (depends on theme)

[Abambo]

It's not the prompt, and if you read, what @daniellei4510 says, you will need to edit every single generated AI asset. And that is not different from photos, but the errors are different. 

[daniellei4510]

There is no such thing as a "quality prompt." Some of my best generations were created with three words and required generous amounts of editing. The majority of details in my longer prompts are completely ignored. And they also required generous editing. Yes, there are "themes" or subjects that might not require meticulous editing. But 99.999 percent of them can still be improved upon with editing. I suppose it can safely be stated that size also matters. If you're submitting the minimum 4MP assets, these will probably require less if any editing. But then, one just might as well be working on an assembly line. And consequently make more money that way. . 😉

[Adam28219092hwx0]

That metal booger though, in image #2 . . .

The cat image brightness and/or contrast is off. The cat also has a lot of white specs that are distracting.

Image 3 has a random strand of something protruding from the woma's choker, her eyes are poorly drawn, her nose ring looks like a cartoon nose ring, etc.

You need a keener eye for this kind of stuff. And so do I. I'm constantly trying to increase the quality of images I submit by being my own harshest critic. These images are bad. With some work they could be good. The cat image might be a lost cause though.

[Abambo]

I wouldn't start improving any of those images. There are just too many errors, and some can only be corrected when you simply recreate the image.