Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello @migueL5D3A, I am going to be honest with you. The photo is of bad quality. If you view the photo at 200%, you can see that none of the photo is focused and that the photo is covered with artifacts. The saturation is also way too much.
Did you edit the original photo? Do you shoot in caqmera RAW? What camera dide you use?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello @migueL5D3A, I am going to be honest with you. The photo is of bad quality. If you view the photo at 200%, you can see that none of the photo is focused and that the photo is covered with artifacts. The saturation is also way too much.
Did you edit the original photo? Do you shoot in caqmera RAW? What camera dide you use?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hello, @Ralph Lear thank you very much for your answer, because the truth is I am new, so they have not accepted any photo, it tells me that a minimum to upload the photo is 15 megapixels, in measures how much would it be, what do you use to edit? I have not managed to upload any , my camera is a Nikon 5600, Thank you for you support
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The minimum is 4 megapixels which is very low for todays standards.
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You know why: Technical issues. If this is the picture you uploaded, ask yourself: would you spend 30 bucks on a picture like this and being happy?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
@Abambo Obviously I like it a lot, but I want to know what mistakes I have to improve and I know the photo on which I would spend 30 dollars. Thank u
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
That's a good camera, so it's hard to understand how the picture is so bad (not the photography - the image). What exactly did you do to this picture after taking it, to get this terrible JPEG file?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Take the original picture like it came out of the camera. This one is obviously overprocessed and that awful blockbuilding makes it unsuitable for any use you intend, may be except "modern" art. It is so bad that I even can't imagine what you did to the picture.