can you explain why my image was rejected after approval a few days later ??
Copy link to clipboard
Hi Amine Yesaad,
No-complient reason means that "your content doesn’t comply with (Adobe's) Contributor Agreement. Content may be non-compliant due to watermarks, inappropriate or irrelevant keywords or image titles, or questionable, or defamatory content. Your file is also rejected as non-compliant if you receive a reminder to submit a model or property release, or resolve a problem with a release, and you resubmit the file without addressing the issue."
I cannot properly see what is below the book. If that's a watermark, or signature, that could be the reason for rejection.
What I do not understand is that this image was accepted and a few days after it was rejected, why?
Otherwise, it's a photomanipulation that I created myself and that I put my signature down
It just may be that the reviewer made a mistake, and it shouldn't have been accepted in the first place.
Hi Amine Yessaad,
Your signature should not be placed on any of your files for upload. Therefore it was an oversight of the moderator who approved it, thus when recognized, was subsequently rejected. This happen from time to time. Sometimes the error is realized shortly after approval, sometime long after when a customer highlights it. Remove your signature and re-upload.
You may benefit from https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html which highlights why files are rejected as you are directed to other links with more information about Adobe's policies for stock contributors.
Thanks for your feedback,
I deleted the signature on my images and I have it published again