My question is regarding Unusual Sell

[muhammad_7751]

There is one question that always makes me feel sad. In the case of unusual sell, the issue is usually not with the contributor, but rather with the buyer, who engages in spamming. Yet, Adobe Stock ends up blocking the contributor’s account for "suspicious activities," even though they have done nothing wrong. Why doesn’t Adobe Stock block the buyer instead? On the other hand, the innocent contributor ends up losing years of hard work because of someone else's wrongdoing۔

[Jill_C]

What kind of "spamming" is the Buyer engaging in? It costs them a credit for every download, so there is no incentive to download many similar images, though they might download 2 variations in order to offer choices to their client. Adobe is not going to ban paying customers.