Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Focus is not good.
The picture looks like having those in-camera-generated faux DOF and artefacts. In addition, it has no detail (out of focus), the whites are blown out (over exposed). And I agree with @ricky336: the composition is bad.
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Do you have a question for us, P.S.Natura? It's not good enough for stock, if that's your question.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Focus is not good.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The composition also isn't good.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The picture looks like having those in-camera-generated faux DOF and artefacts. In addition, it has no detail (out of focus), the whites are blown out (over exposed). And I agree with @ricky336: the composition is bad.
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
There was a camera shake, also there was not enough depth of field. Most of the frame was not focused plus the shake.
Best wishes
JG
Photographer and Nutrition Author