• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • EspaƱol
      • FranƧais
      • PortuguĆŖs
  • ę—„ęœ¬čŖžć‚³ćƒŸćƒ„ćƒ‹ćƒ†ć‚£
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • ķ•œźµ­ ģ»¤ė®¤ė‹ˆķ‹°
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
1

Nature

Community Beginner ,
Aug 16, 2021 Aug 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

20210814_183243.jpg

TOPICS
Contributor critique , Contributors , Fotolia , Troubleshooting

Views

168

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 2 Correct answers

Community Expert , Aug 16, 2021 Aug 16, 2021

Focus is not good.

 

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert , Aug 17, 2021 Aug 17, 2021

The picture looks like having those in-camera-generated faux DOF and artefacts. In addition, it has no detail (out of focus), the whites are blown out (over exposed). And I agree with @ricky336: the composition is bad.

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for

...

Votes

Translate

Translate
LEGEND ,
Aug 16, 2021 Aug 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Do you have a question for us, P.S.Natura? It's not good enough for stock, if that's your question. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Aug 16, 2021 Aug 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Focus is not good.

 

Nancy O'Sheaā€” Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Aug 16, 2021 Aug 16, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The composition also isn't good.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Aug 17, 2021 Aug 17, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The picture looks like having those in-camera-generated faux DOF and artefacts. In addition, it has no detail (out of focus), the whites are blown out (over exposed). And I agree with @ricky336: the composition is bad.

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Oct 01, 2021 Oct 01, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Hi @PhotoShootNatura,

There was a camera shake, also there was not enough depth of field. Most of the frame was not focused plus the shake.

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines