Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi, I make stuff like this sometimes, I am wondering how content quality guidlines can somehow reject geometric abstraction as a genre? I understand a platform probably wants to control the overall represtation of themselves and its associations, feel free to let me know!
What was the rejection reason? I guess technical issues?
I've seen hard edges, where there should be soft ones:
This is not a natural cut-off.
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
Hi @Rylen , I also see a couple of dead pixels in the image and chromatic aberration in the top left white line.
I hope this helps.
(...), so I expect some minor issues with quality as I attempt to conform my work to standards (...)
By @Rylen
Perfection is just enough.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Was it rejected for "technical reasons"?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
yes
Its def possible because its super dark, depending on what happens with the next 19 I can try uploading non edited ones next
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
What was the rejection reason? I guess technical issues?
I've seen hard edges, where there should be soft ones:
This is not a natural cut-off.
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
hmm, I am trying to create physical structures and implications with light, I will try making more natural hard edges vs soft edges (:
I've really wanted to bridge my interest in geometric abstraction with photography in a way that utilizes the present moment in the surrounding area when the photo is taken, so I expect some minor issues with quality as I attempt to conform my work to standards
 heres what I do with ink, thanks for the feedback!
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
(...), so I expect some minor issues with quality as I attempt to conform my work to standards (...)
By @Rylen
Perfection is just enough.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Hi @Rylen , I also see a couple of dead pixels in the image and chromatic aberration in the top left white line.
I hope this helps.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
This is a commercial business. Ask yourself who will buy this and what will they use it for? If the answer to either question is "I don't know," it's probably not right for Adobe Stock.
I can make my own fractals and other abstract designs in Photoshop with one hand tied behind my back -- both manually and with scripts. There is no shortage of abstracts in Stock's inventory. But the bigger question is does it sell? No.
Stock customers come here searching for high quality images of real places, people and things that they can use in commercial projects like videos, magazines, billboards, merchandise and million dollar ad campaigns.
If you want to be successful at Stock, put your time into more profitable pursuits. Read these links:
Better luck next time.