• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • EspaƱol
      • FranƧais
      • PortuguĆŖs
  • ę—„ęœ¬čŖžć‚³ćƒŸćƒ„ćƒ‹ćƒ†ć‚£
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • ķ•œźµ­ ģ»¤ė®¤ė‹ˆķ‹°
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

No me aceptan

New Here ,
Nov 08, 2021 Nov 08, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hace dos dias subi estas fotos y no me las aceptaron. Porque?IMG-20211011-WA0083_digital_art_x4_colored_toned.jpgIMG-20210823-WA0091-957a2ca0-3ded-11ec-b310-f639c2605eb2.jpgIMG-20210506-WA0284-42024e3c-3dec-11ec-b310-f639c2605eb2.jpgIMG-20210506-WA0361-426be082-3deb-11ec-b310-f639c2605eb2.jpg

TOPICS
Contributor critique , Contributors , Fotolia , Troubleshooting

Views

88

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Enthusiast ,
Nov 08, 2021 Nov 08, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hoal Pau,

Entre otras cosas:

#1 demasiado oscura y mƔs que nada, no es nƭtida

#2 muy oscura y Ɣreas claros sobreexpuestos, sin ningun detalle

MNiessenPhoto_0-1636393481664.png

 

#3 no estƔ bien enfocada. TambiƩn hay partes sobreexpuestas y absolutamente ningun detalle en las zonas oscuras

#4 igual que la demƔs, no es nƭtida. Agua (el sujeto de esta foto) muy oscura, cielo sobreexpuesto

 

Michael

_____________

Michael Niessen - Photographer, photo-editor, educator

 

Photo-editing (Ps/Lr/LrC) and photography workshops & one-on-one training (off- and online)

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Nov 08, 2021 Nov 08, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

"They" did tell you a reason! I suppose it was technical issues. And you can see it without a deep analysis:

  1. Missing details, your camera/post-processing eliminated the fine structure of the fur of the animals (and the surroundings):Abambo_0-1636392925855.png
    That is typical for small sensor cameras (phone?)! If you want to avoid this, you need to be able to shoot raw in optimal conditions. In addition, the picture is underexposed.

     

  2. Same here. The picture shows the painterly look and is underexposed. In addition, the blown out white sunshine spots make it difficult to edit this picture correctly. Even that the people are masked, you will need model releases.
  3. In addition to what has been said above, the picture is not sharp.
  4. In addition to other problems, this picture is overexposed in the upper region and underexposed in the lower region. Your camera lenses and the sensor are totally overstrained with situations of high contrast areas: Abambo_1-1636393775344.png

    If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
    Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
    See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
    and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Nov 08, 2021 Nov 08, 2021

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Hi @Pau5E92,

All photos are underexpose. Please zoom to between 100 and 200% to inspect your photos for errors.

Most of the first photo is out of focus and thus not completely sharp. The right front leg runs into the background as if its a painting. Between the hind leg and tail of the mother monkey is a halo.

 

The highlights of the second photo is too high and thus destroys some of the details. Because you underexposed there are a lot of chromatic noise in the shadow areas. These are visible on the lamp pole, fence frame and the hands of the lady. That shot too is not properly focused. For example the blurry lady's hands and forefront.

 

The third photo is also out of focus. We need to see the entire structure. Some of it gets lost in the dark. Also that image also displays chromatic noise.

 

Details of the next photo are lost because of too much highlights. That also has color noise close to the area of the strong light. And also details are lost in the shadows. There is a technique to deal with highlights as in the image using flash as filter-light. You will need to practice, however, so as not to end up with a burnt-our image because of being too close to the subject.

 

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines