Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
5

Non-compliance rejection, File ID: 731066368 Original name: D85_8558 Blue Oyster Mushrooms.jpg

Explorer ,
Feb 25, 2024 Feb 25, 2024

Looking for some help. What can I change to make the image more acceptable? The explanation for rejection isn't clear. Non-compliant image, undeclared AI, use of another artist's name and non-compliant with overall guidelines. Not sure what any of those mean. It's not an AI image

TOPICS
Contributor critique
545
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 2 Correct answers

Community Expert , Feb 25, 2024 Feb 25, 2024

Setting aside the "official" reason for rejection, I'm not quite sure what's going on in this image. Areas that have no reason to be out of focus are severely lacking in detail. Over-processing? Not sure. But there doesn't appear to be any logical reason why these areas are so soft in comparison to similar areas on the same plane of focus. Interestingly enough, these issues are very similar to what can happen in an AI generated image, and perhaps this is the reason for the official rejection. Be

...
Translate
Community Expert , Feb 26, 2024 Feb 26, 2024

Hello,

This is a bit strange

ricky336_0-1708936956432.png

 

Did you blur this part? Quality could also be a factor here!

Also, look at your keywords - did you use any brand name in the keywords - or keywords that could be mistaken for a brand name?!

There can be a variety of reasons for this rejection, so it is a bit hard to determine what exactly.

Translate
Community Expert ,
Feb 25, 2024 Feb 25, 2024

Setting aside the "official" reason for rejection, I'm not quite sure what's going on in this image. Areas that have no reason to be out of focus are severely lacking in detail. Over-processing? Not sure. But there doesn't appear to be any logical reason why these areas are so soft in comparison to similar areas on the same plane of focus. Interestingly enough, these issues are very similar to what can happen in an AI generated image, and perhaps this is the reason for the official rejection. Because a camera simply wouldn't do this.

 

D85_8558 Blue Oyster Mushrooms.jpg


daniellei4510 | Forum Volunteer | I just had surgery and my opinions are medically induced.
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Feb 26, 2024 Feb 26, 2024

Ah! This was a focus stacked image that I didn't inspect closely enough! Thank you! This will encourage me to examine my images more closely, especially when I do a focus stack! Thanks!

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 26, 2024 Feb 26, 2024

Well, that explains the weird blur on your assets. 

 

You should examine your assets at 100%. If you think you see an issue, going to 200% or even further will help to identify the issue. 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 26, 2024 Feb 26, 2024
LATEST

Ah, thanks for the update as to the cause!


daniellei4510 | Forum Volunteer | I just had surgery and my opinions are medically induced.
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 26, 2024 Feb 26, 2024

Hello,

This is a bit strange

ricky336_0-1708936956432.png

 

Did you blur this part? Quality could also be a factor here!

Also, look at your keywords - did you use any brand name in the keywords - or keywords that could be mistaken for a brand name?!

There can be a variety of reasons for this rejection, so it is a bit hard to determine what exactly.

ï––
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Feb 26, 2024 Feb 26, 2024

Thank you! No, I didn't intentionally blur it. It's a focus stacked image that I didn't inspect closely enough. Everyone is coming in with the same critique and it's encouraging! I can inspect my images more closely to either fix them or start over.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 26, 2024 Feb 26, 2024

Well, there are clearly reasons to reject this asset for quality issues.

 

As for the non-compliant image, there are multiple reasons that may trigger that, probably keywords, title, but may also be the content.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Feb 26, 2024 Feb 26, 2024

Thanks for your answer! Clearly, I need to examine my images more closely! I would reject that one too. This will help me!

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 26, 2024 Feb 26, 2024

You're welcome.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines