• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

None of these img were accepted... WHY? Help me please

Community Beginner ,
Jan 14, 2022 Jan 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi, I'm new to this community, and I just saw that NONE of these photos passed through your minimum standards, and I really don't know why, it just says "technical problems"…
Thank you.

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

465

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Jan 14, 2022 Jan 14, 2022

Burning sky:

Missing blacks, as shown in the histogram, therefore missing contrasts:

Abambo_3-1642177858429.png

Artefacts, a bit everywhere where you look (seen at 100%):

Abambo_4-1642177936864.png

 

Encaged little garden:

Out of focus, overexposed, typical artefacts of small sensor cameras:

Abambo_2-1642177773403.png

 

Ant's path:

Artefacts, colour noise because of the phone's fake DOF.

Abambo_0-1642177473321.png

Shadows are underexposed (blue area where clipping occurs).

Abambo_1-1642177592569.png

The way's eye:

Underexposed, as shown in the histogram:

Abambo_5-1642178139345.png

No structure, washed out colours, typical for small sensor photos:

Abambo_6-1642178232935.png

...

Votes

Translate

Translate
Community Beginner ,
Jan 14, 2022 Jan 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

By the way, sorry for the errors and the images dubled, I can't edit the post, it seems...

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 14, 2022 Jan 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I deleted the doubles and also corrected the errors. You need to reach a certain level to be able to edit your own posts, this because of users editing back required edits from the moderators. Sorry for the inconvenience. Those are Adobe's rules…

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jan 14, 2022 Jan 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Oh, I see! Thank you very much!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 14, 2022 Jan 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

You're welcome.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 14, 2022 Jan 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

1. Noisy

2. Plants are not all sharply focused, probably due to depth of field

3. Too much out of focus
4. Underexposed, unfocused, white balance issue

5. Focus, noise, chromatic aberration

6. Focus

7. artifacts in the sky 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 14, 2022 Jan 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Burning sky:

Missing blacks, as shown in the histogram, therefore missing contrasts:

Abambo_3-1642177858429.png

Artefacts, a bit everywhere where you look (seen at 100%):

Abambo_4-1642177936864.png

 

Encaged little garden:

Out of focus, overexposed, typical artefacts of small sensor cameras:

Abambo_2-1642177773403.png

 

Ant's path:

Artefacts, colour noise because of the phone's fake DOF.

Abambo_0-1642177473321.png

Shadows are underexposed (blue area where clipping occurs).

Abambo_1-1642177592569.png

The way's eye:

Underexposed, as shown in the histogram:

Abambo_5-1642178139345.png

No structure, washed out colours, typical for small sensor photos:

Abambo_6-1642178232935.png

Life to heaven:

Artefacts and missing structure typical for small sensor cameras:

Abambo_7-1642178332328.png

Painterly look, due to over optimization:

Abambo_8-1642178378649.png

Tiny path:

Looks like you had motion blur.

Abambo_9-1642178507536.png

 

Abambo_10-1642178529160.png

 I do not see anything in focus.

In addition: Chromatic aberration and other artefacts.

 

Mallorca:

Artefacts, artefacts, artefacts...

Abambo_11-1642178679931.png

Abambo_12-1642178694897.png

Abambo_13-1642178740233.png

Nothing is really in focus.

 

All your pictures have probably been taken with a phone camera. Even though smartphone cameras are accepted, the images are examined with the same quality criteria as images from large and expensive cameras. Only a few pictures taken under the best conditions and processed with as little AI as possible have the quality required here. The small sensor has bigger problems with borderline conditions. The lenses also have no depth of field. This is usually emulated on the software side, but this rarely leads to acceptable images.

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jan 14, 2022 Jan 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Wow that's really an elaboration of the why's! Thank you very much! Even, alas no image has been accepted, I'm happy for all your effort on teachering the issues! I'll look how improve the quality of my photo's!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jan 14, 2022 Jan 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

You're welcome. We all have our share of refusals…

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines