Photos rejected due to 'quality issues'

[Swells64]

I am having a similar issue. Has something changed? These photos were rejected in terms of quality, but I have had similar photos accepted and sold on Adobe stock. Do bots assess the submissions or people?

[user hijacked a different thread, moderator detached this.]

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

I previously commented on the 4th image in another thread. All of the images have very visible artifacts in the sky which are apparent without having to zoom in and inspect carefully.

Adobe employs human moderstors. No bots are used to review submissions.

[jacquelingphoto2017 · Accepted solution]

Hi @Swells64,

I believe too much of your first file becomes obscured in motion blur. Building should be stationary so personally I don't see its application for stock Additionally there are a lot of color noise.

The highlights of the second and third files is too high, hence having an exposure problem.

The forth file is under exposed with high highlights

The fifth file is also underexposed and has color noise.

The sixth file also has color noise.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

[Swells64]

Thanks everybody for your valuable feedback. May I beg your indulgence one more and ask for citique of this photo? 

[Abambo]

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

If you are a generative AI contributor, please look into these instructions and follow them by the letter: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/generative-ai-submission-guidelines/td...