Photos rejected for technical issues

New Here ,
Apr 12, 2022 Apr 12, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello everyone,

 

Adobe rejected theese photos for technical issues. I'm sure that the white balance is perfect. I used Photoshop only for scale the images or to crop them.

 

Thanks in advance,

Cesare

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

126

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Adobe Community Professional , Apr 12, 2022 Apr 12, 2022
Besides problems, like artefacts and noise, you also have exposure problems on both pictures. This is the histogram from Rejected1: You see that the whites are missing. Furthermore, because you did not use the whole range, contrast is missing. Looking at that picture at 100%, you see that it's pretty out of focus. Unfortunately, you did not include EXIF data, but from the artefacts, I would guess that this is a picture from a smaller sensor camera. Correctly adjusted, denoised and in focus, t...

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional ,
Apr 12, 2022 Apr 12, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Besides problems, like artefacts and noise, you also have exposure problems on both pictures.

 

Abambo_0-1649783780488.png

This is the histogram from Rejected1: You see that the whites are missing. Furthermore, because you did not use the whole range, contrast is missing.

Looking at that picture at 100%, you see that it's pretty out of focus. Unfortunately, you did not include EXIF data, but from the artefacts, I would guess that this is a picture from a smaller sensor camera. Correctly adjusted, denoised and in focus, the picture would be a nice one. But as presented, it's not good enough to be added to stock.

 

The same is true for your Rejected picture:

Abambo_1-1649784244036.png

Out of focus, noise and artefacts, missing contrasts…

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

 

 

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Apr 12, 2022 Apr 12, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you. I used all the whole range, maybe it's caused by the camera sensor that's small. Excuse me, but when you said there are no whites, do you mean that the photos are underexposed? 

Regards

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Apr 12, 2022 Apr 12, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Whites are at the right of the histogram. The histogram goes basically (from left to right) from blacks-shadow-exposure-highlight-whites.

 

The exposure values are the middle of the histogram. When the curve is a straight line, that means that this part is missing, in your case the whites and part of the highlights. That's underexposed.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Apr 12, 2022 Apr 12, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The photos are underexposed and the sky is a little too noisy.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Apr 12, 2022 Apr 12, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hi @Cesare5C78,

Your photos are under exposed and has both color and luminance noise grains. To the extent of the underexposure, details are lost. You must be able to see the details in your photos as though you were looking on in real life. Therefore you need to use a camera whereby you can adjust for good exposure.

If you look carefully at this screenprint you will notice the grains in the sky. Also a closer look you will notice that some of the grains are colorful.

jacquelingphoto2017_0-1649809389165.png

In addition to the Adobe resource given, you will benefit from some additional information on what is required to get your files accepted here, to produce good quality stock photos here and the limitations associated with small sensor cameras here.

 

Best wishes

Jacquelin

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Apr 13, 2022 Apr 13, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Thank you 🙂

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Apr 13, 2022 Apr 13, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

You are welcome @Cesare5C78 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines