• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers

Photos was rejected because of quality issue

New Here ,
Dec 12, 2022 Dec 12, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Can anyone suggest the reason for the rejection 

TOPICS
Troubleshooting

Views

313

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 6 Correct answers

Community Expert , Dec 12, 2022 Dec 12, 2022

The first photo (rose) is not focused properly and the upper edges of the inner petals are blown out and have no detail. The photo is also quite noisy.

The third photo (bread) is also out of focus.

The fourth phooto (island) is also out of focus, noisy and has compression artifacts.

Likes

Translate

Translate
LEGEND , Dec 13, 2022 Dec 13, 2022

Horse - imperfect composition. The horse is off centre. Photo not sharp.

Indian village - photo really not sharp. Would also need seven model releases signed by models or parents of models, despite apparent attempts to hide faces.

Likes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert , Dec 13, 2022 Dec 13, 2022

1: out of focus, underexposed: missing whites. Colours are unnatural.

2: Overexposed: missing blacks. Parts of the clouds look unnaturally photoshopped:

Abambo_0-1670932800648.png

3: Where is the focus:

Abambo_1-1670933038915.png

The butter has no structure. This picture looks like one that has been heavily upsized.

4. Full of artefacts:

Abambo_2-1670933184880.png

5: completely unsharp:

Abambo_3-1670933258009.png

6: completely unsharp. Question to a Horse breeder: how many legs does a white horse have?

Abambo_4-1670933459852.png

7: Completely out of focus. If it were in focus, you would have to provide a model release for

...

Likes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert , Dec 13, 2022 Dec 13, 2022

1. Red roses are blurry. There are nearly 1.8 million images of red roses in the database. While photographing and editing flowers is good practice for a beginner, you're unlikely to ever sell one on any stock agency.

2. Clouds has blownout areas which cannot be repaired.

3. Poorly composed, poorly lit, out of focus, blownout highlights 

4. Oversaturated, artifacts everywhere, missing structure/detail presumably due to small sensor (mobile phone?)

5. Blown highlights, cropped too close (where's

...

Likes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert , Dec 13, 2022 Dec 13, 2022

AI generated illustrations have many well-known problems with colors, eyes, mouths, hands, legs & feet. Results are often unacceptable if not ridiculous.  Inspect AI images carefully at increased magnification. If you can't correct the failures manually, don't submit the images. 

 

 

 

Likes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert , Dec 14, 2022 Dec 14, 2022

These are for sure AI-generated. An old film camera e.g. the Kodamatic would produce better results!

 

Likes

Translate

Translate
Community Expert ,
Dec 12, 2022 Dec 12, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

The first photo (rose) is not focused properly and the upper edges of the inner petals are blown out and have no detail. The photo is also quite noisy.

The third photo (bread) is also out of focus.

The fourth phooto (island) is also out of focus, noisy and has compression artifacts.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Dec 13, 2022 Dec 13, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Horse - imperfect composition. The horse is off centre. Photo not sharp.

Indian village - photo really not sharp. Would also need seven model releases signed by models or parents of models, despite apparent attempts to hide faces.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Dec 13, 2022 Dec 13, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

1: out of focus, underexposed: missing whites. Colours are unnatural.

2: Overexposed: missing blacks. Parts of the clouds look unnaturally photoshopped:

Abambo_0-1670932800648.png

3: Where is the focus:

Abambo_1-1670933038915.png

The butter has no structure. This picture looks like one that has been heavily upsized.

4. Full of artefacts:

Abambo_2-1670933184880.png

5: completely unsharp:

Abambo_3-1670933258009.png

6: completely unsharp. Question to a Horse breeder: how many legs does a white horse have?

Abambo_4-1670933459852.png

7: Completely out of focus. If it were in focus, you would have to provide a model release for each person, including this alien:

Abambo_5-1670933658741.png

 

I would suggest you use real photographs instead of bad AI art. Don't think that any of these pictures is in any way near to get accepted.

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

 

 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Dec 13, 2022 Dec 13, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

1. Red roses are blurry. There are nearly 1.8 million images of red roses in the database. While photographing and editing flowers is good practice for a beginner, you're unlikely to ever sell one on any stock agency.

2. Clouds has blownout areas which cannot be repaired.

3. Poorly composed, poorly lit, out of focus, blownout highlights 

4. Oversaturated, artifacts everywhere, missing structure/detail presumably due to small sensor (mobile phone?)

5. Blown highlights, cropped too close (where's the top of the head?)

6. Lacking any photo-realism. In addition to the 5th leg noted by @Abambo @the eye has no iris and the coat is blue...

7. This is a blurry mess; the people look like zombies 

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Dec 13, 2022 Dec 13, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

@Jill_C ,

I think they are AI generated and up-scaled.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Dec 13, 2022 Dec 13, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

AI generated illustrations have many well-known problems with colors, eyes, mouths, hands, legs & feet. Results are often unacceptable if not ridiculous.  Inspect AI images carefully at increased magnification. If you can't correct the failures manually, don't submit the images. 

 

 

 

Nancy O'Shea, Product User & Community Expert
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Dec 14, 2022 Dec 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

These are for sure AI-generated. An old film camera e.g. the Kodamatic would produce better results!

 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Dec 14, 2022 Dec 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

If these are AI, then they ARE NOT photos. That is a LIE, and it would be illegal for Adobe to sell them as a photo (in some countries at least). So of course Adobe will reject it for that reason alone.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Dec 14, 2022 Dec 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

If they were good quality (they aren't), they would need to be marked as illustrations according to Adobe's rules. announcing-the-adobe-stock-policy-on-generative-ai-content 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Dec 14, 2022 Dec 14, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST
quote

These are for sure AI-generated. An old film camera e.g. the Kodamatic would produce better results!

 


By @ricky336

😄 Including 5 legged horses… I rarely saw such a mass of bad pictures than these AI ones. Even the good ones of them are riddled with mistakes.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines