Please give me your feedback for this Rejected Photo

[Sergio23701002y9og]

[Jill_C · Accepted solution]

The white balance is off, and the animals' hair has an over-sharpened spiky look.

[jacquelingphoto2017]

Hi @Sergio23701002y9og ,

Also it is underexposed and has too much of a shallow depth of field.

Best wishes

Jacquelin

[Sergio23701002y9og]

Thank you Jacquelin, 

I appreciate your reply.  Your help is greatly appreciated. 

One question:

Isnt shallow depth of field acceptable in nature shoots?

[Abambo]

One question:

Isnt shallow depth of field acceptable in nature shoots?

By @Sergio23701002y9og

Yes, it is. The DOF is probably not the refusal cause if your subject is in focus.

[Marianne-Deiters · Accepted solution]

It looks like you have done a color toning and other that you better avoid.

[Sergio23701002y9og]

Thank you it makes sense! 

[ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Hello,

If you used filters in this shot - don't. Keep the photo in normal colours. Buyers can add their own stylistic filters.

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content...

[Sergio23701002y9og]

I agree, thank you for replying.  Just trying to become a better photographer 🙂 

[Abambo]

Filters don't make you a better photographer. Filters will be applied by the buyer if he or she has a need for them.

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html