• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Por que han sido rechazadas mis fotos?

New Here ,
Jun 02, 2023 Jun 02, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Aqui les dejo algunas fotos, quisiera obtener ayuda para saber porque han sido rechazadas por la plataforma.

 

El mensaje que recibi fue el siguiente:

 

Ingles:

 

Thanks for giving us the chance to consider your image. Unfortunately, this image doesn't meet our quality standards so we can’t accept it into our collection.

Common issues that can impact the technical quality of images include exposure issues, soft focus, excessive filtering or artifacts/noise. Learn more about our technical requirements here.

To learn more about the type of content we’re looking for, please visit this page.

If you are looking for specific feedback on your image, we recommend you create a post in the critique forum where you can solicit feedback from other Adobe Stock Contributors.

 

Español:

 

Gracias por darnos la oportunidad de considerar su imagen. Desafortunadamente, esta imagen no cumple con nuestros estándares de calidad, por lo que no podemos aceptarla en nuestra colección.

Los problemas comunes que pueden afectar la calidad técnica de las imágenes incluyen problemas de exposición, enfoque suave, filtrado excesivo o artefactos/ruido. Obtenga más información sobre nuestros requisitos técnicos aquí.

Para obtener más información sobre el tipo de contenido que buscamos, visite esta página.

Si está buscando comentarios específicos sobre su imagen, le recomendamos que cree una publicación en el foro de críticas donde puede solicitar comentarios de otros Colaboradores de Adobe Stock.

 

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

227

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 02, 2023 Jun 02, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

JCP_2070.jpg - underexposed and noisy 

JCP_2073.jpg - also underexposed and noisy, and there is a possible IP violation in the paper in the lower right corner

JCP_2089.jpg - depth of field is too shallow, causing most of the image to be out of focus 

 

You don't need to include the English translation here; the built in translate function works well. Also, there is an expectation here in the forum that only 2-3 images should be uploaded for comment from the community. Indeed, since the quality issues are similar in each of your images, looking at just a few is sufficient to provide feedback.

 

 

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Explorer ,
Jun 02, 2023 Jun 02, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hola, compañero. No soy experto, sólo uno que también ha visto muchas de sus fotos rechazadas en esta agencia. Me aventuro a suponer que la causa, en tu caso, puede ser que sean fotos, para entendernos, "muy vistas". Habrá miles de fotos de frutas y hortalizas, como de flores, paisajes, etc. Son temas que, aunque las imágenes esten perfectas no son aceptadas por lo recurrentes. Yo he llegado a la conclusión que lo que hay que hacer es especializarse en un tema e intentar alcanzar la excelencia no sólo en la calidad técnica, sino en la originalidad de la presentación. En definitiva, intentar ofrecer "algo distinto", aunque ya se sabe que es muy difícil ya que todo está inventado y/o descubierto. Te animo a no desfallecer. ¡Suerte!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Jun 07, 2023 Jun 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Si, yo tambien estoy llegando a esa conclusion, porque en muchas dicen que falta calidad, pero me han aceptado mas  fotos hechas con un celular que ahora que tengo una full frame y hago post-produccion con Luminar.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 02, 2023 Jun 02, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Compare your work with current Stock inventory. 

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=fresh.produce

 

Put yourself in the customer's shoes. 

  • Is yours as good or better than what Stock has?
  • Would you buy it?
  • Does yours look clean, fresh & appetizing? 
  • Is the composition good? 
  • Is the light good?
  • Are the details sharp and clear?

These are questions you must ask yourself before you submit to Stock.

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 03, 2023 Jun 03, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Next time just post the header of the refusal: "Quality Issues". The text is always the sane and not important. The mechanical translation is quite good, but multiple languages may confuse the system, so it's best to stay in one language. 

As checking assets takes time, you should limit yourself to one to three assets and then check, if you can check the reminder by yourself. You can always post a new request, if the solutions offered for one asset do not fit a different one.

 

This said, I checked 2086:

IMG_1426.jpeg

You clearly see the high noise level, when checked at 100%. You used ISO 1000, so you should apply a good noise reduction. Lightroom has currently a great noise reduction process at the raw level. You should use that for high ISO pictures. 

 

In addition, you used an aperture of f2.8. That gives a very narrow DOF. in this case, it's to narrow. There is defacto nothing in focus. Your camera can do better (I'm using the same). I rarely push the aperture to the limits, and especially not for such a subject, where there is no natural unique eye catcher.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines