"Private property" is not an exact rejection. Adobe are not looking at where you stand to make a photograph (public or private place). "Intellectual property" is however very important, and not the same thing at all. Please give the exact rejection so we can guide you.
Sorry, I have to reject my question, I mixed something up there.
Copy link to clipboard
Those images have been rejected for quality issues. They are oversaturated and have a white balance issue.
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
If you are a generative AI contributor, please look into these instructions and follow them by the letter: https://community.adobe.com/t5/stock-contributors-discussions/generative-ai-submission-guidelines/td...
You can write in German here, and you should copy and paste the rejection header instead of paraphrasing or translating.
Refusal reasons may be:
In English, those are:
Both have overexposed sky and path, and over saturated in general.