Qualitätsprobleme?

[Alexander25730939oju8]

Hey Leute,

leider wird ein Großteil meiner Bilder abgelehnt. Ich verstehe nicht ganz weshalb.

Bilder sind KI generiert, hochskaliert und nachbearbeitet. Bild 1 und 5 zum Beispiel wurden akzeptiert, die anderen abgelehnt wegen Qualitätsproblemen.

Danke euch vorab!

[JuliO111]

Hi there! Welcome to Adobe Stock community!

Heres some info for you:

1) About 3 photographs are usually taken from one series
2) As people here usually say, too dark photographs are often rejected
3) Small details, levitating objects can be a problem even if its fantastic mood
4) Even futurism and complex science fiction things should be logical (maps, people, buildings)

I would advise not to focus on rejections and just work with other topics which you interesting and have commercial perspective.

[JuliO111]

Hallo! Willkommen in der Adobe Stock-Community!

Hier sind einige Informationen für Sie:

1) Normalerweise werden etwa 3 Fotos aus einer Serie aufgenommen.
2) Wie die Leute hier normalerweise sagen, werden zu dunkle Fotos oft abgelehnt.
3) Kleine Details und schwebende Objekte können ein Problem sein, selbst wenn die Stimmung fantastisch ist.
4) Selbst futuristische und komplexe Science-Fiction-Dinge sollten logisch sein (Karten, Menschen, Gebäude).

Ich würde Ihnen raten, sich nicht auf Ablehnungen zu konzentrieren und einfach mit anderen Themen zu arbeiten, die Sie interessieren und eine kommerzielle Perspektive haben.

[Abambo]

Either answer in German or in English, not in both languages. It makes it more difficult to follow the conversation. People can use the built-in translation tool, if they do not understand what you post. In general, and if you speak that language, it is courtesy to answer in their language, except if there are reasons for not doing that.

This message should not discourage you to further answer, and answering and helping other users is highly appreciated. The advice is just based on a rather huge experience.

[JuliO111]

You are right in general. But as a person who constantly moves from country to country without knowing the language — I would like such respectfull treatment.

[Abambo]

You are right in general. But as a person who constantly moves from country to country without knowing the language — I would like such respectfull treatment.

By @JuliO111

You answer in the language you know. But if OP posts in German, and you are able to answer in German, do it. But do not make two posts, one in German, the other in English.

I answer in German and French too, but sometimes, when tired, I use the language that is more fluent to me. Neither English, nor French, nor German are my first language. 

[Abambo]

Hi there! Welcome to Adobe Stock community!

Heres some info for you:

1) About 3 photographs are usually taken from one series
2) As people here usually say, too dark photographs are often rejected
3) Small details, levitating objects can be a problem even if its fantastic mood
4) Even futurism and complex science fiction things should be logical (maps, people, buildings)

I would advise not to focus on rejections and just work with other topics which you interesting and have commercial perspective.

By @JuliO111

1) is wrong.

2) that is wrong, too. Pictures need to be correctly exposed.

3) that is wrong, too. You need to check for artefacts and errors in your asset. If an asset is complex, chances are that you have plenty of errors.

4) is correct.

I would advise focusing on rejections to learn what gets accepted and what not.

[JuliO111]

1) Based on my own statistics

2) Probably right

3) and 4) was the same about fantastic pics must have logic too. 

[Abambo]

1) Based on my own statistics

2) Probably right

3) and 4) was the same about fantastic pics must have logic too. 

By @JuliO111

1) Your statistics are wrong. 

Your 3 is straight nonsense. Again check for artefacts. They can be in big or small strucures. But it is clear that complex images show more oportunity for artefacts. And one detected error (the first one) will lead to a refusal. As the errors in the accepted assets are very visible, I assume that the moderator made pass them through moderation, without looking at them. That happens quite often with generative AI.

[JuliO111]

Well its based on thousands images. At least it works for me like that.

[Abambo]

Well its based on thousands images. At least it works for me like that.

By @JuliO111

It's still nonsense. You need to check for artefacts and errors. If you have a flying car you have a flying car, but it should not contain artefacts.

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Es ist eher verwunderlich, dass 1 und 5 nicht auch abgelehnt wurden. Die Bilder sind alle voll mit Fehlern und Artefakten:

(Bild hier 1): Eigentlich hätte ich alles markieren können.

• Pfeile: Aliasing.
• Kreis: Artefakte.

Bild 5:

• Kreis: die "Fenster" sollten schon schöne geometrisch korrekte Elemente sein.
• Linien: Bei Gebäuden sind die Fluchtlinien und Begrenzungslinien Geraden und nicht wie mit zittriger Hand gezeichnet. Wenn Gebäude ineinander gehen, dann soll dies logisch sein und architektonisch korrekt.

Bild 8:

Artefakte zu sehen bei 100%.

[Jill_C]

Most of the green images are just too similar, but they also suffer from incomplete or poorly drawn edges, blown out hot spots blur and graininess.