Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
1

Quality Issues in High Res with blur background.

Community Beginner ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

Anyone can give expalnation about some of my photo rejection with Quality Issues.

I've take foto in propper light and some natural lens bokeh efect . But, mostly rejection. Thanks for your answer.

 

[Moderator cured the topics. Please do select only relevant topics.]

TOPICS
Contributor critique
590
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

Why did you upload two of the three photos to two different posts?

========================================
Photography is more than just pressing a button!
========================================
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

First:

Your DOF is too small. 

Abambo_0-1749551076296.png

Your main object should be completely in focus for the picture being of use.

 

Your second is noisy and not in focus.

 

Your third is also out of focus: 

Abambo_1-1749551290965.png

...and you should clean the glasses before taking pictures. You need to avoid these reflections in the glass. Finally the picture has exposure issues.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

Hallo Adobe Stock Contributor Community,  I recently uploaded some photos on Adobe Stock & i keep getting messages regarding the quality of my photos that is not good.  I have also uploaded the same photos on another microstock & has been approved.  Can someone tell me why my photos get flagged here?

 

[Moderator merged the thread and deleted duplicate images]

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

All three are slightly over exposed with a little too much contrast and too few midtones.
The second is poorly cropped and the text on the book must be removed.

========================================
Photography is more than just pressing a button!
========================================
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

Can you give some tips for photos with a white background isolation theme so that the midtones are more balanced?

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

midtones: check your histogram.

 

263: noisy, out of focus and underexposed (check the histogram). 

Abambo_0-1749552124091.png

 

56_1: out of focus: 

Abambo_1-1749552326310.png

Underexposed, even that the overall picture looks overexposed. You need to check the histogram! In addition, you have a white balance issue, probably because of the lighting.

Have a look at my before and after editing: In a more sophisticated editing, I would work with masks.

Abambo_2-1749552461957.png

 

Abambo_4-1749552521351.png

As a side remark: Adobe requires pictures to be sRGB, yours are ProPhoto RGB. As I have never seen a picture being refused for using the wrong colour profile, it is always good to stick with what Adobe says in their documentation. At some stage, Adobe may decide to purge their database based on such errors.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

Correcting the exposure will bring the overexposed highlights back into the midtone range.

========================================
Photography is more than just pressing a button!
========================================
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

The focus is too shallow.
Try narrowing the aperture so that a wider range is in focus.
Try zooming in to 100% and you'll see what I mean.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

I deliberately chose to focus on certain objects only. For example, in the first image, the focus is on the blackboard with a bokeh effect on other objects.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

DSC00263

Focus on a wide area of ​​the blackboard surface.
When users use this, they may want to add text or illustrations.
If the area in focus is narrow, it will be difficult to use as material.

 

DSC00057_1

It is best to narrow the aperture so that both "THANK" and "YOU" are in focus.

 

DSC00056_1

It's shaky and blurry.

 

In Adobe Stock, works that are in focus over a wide area are more likely to pass the screening than works that are blurred.

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025
quote

I deliberately chose to focus on certain objects only. For example, in the first image, the focus is on the blackboard with a bokeh effect on other objects.


By @Imago Media

Sure, but your main object should stay in focus. 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

Hello,

Even though you deliberately chose to have a shallow DOF to achieve the 'bokeh' effect, it hasn't worked. What you have ended up with is the items being out of focus. My attention is distracted by the out-of-focus items. Bokeh is an overused term, and I believe people often misunderstand its meaning.

It would be better not to have it if you want the viewer's attention on the board.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025
quote

(...) I have also uploaded the same photos on another microstock & has been approved.  


By @Imago Media

Adobe's turf, Adobe's rules.

 

An example: on France's highways you are allowed to drive at 130 km/h, in Belgium, you may drive only 120 km/h and in Germany, the speed is often unlimited on highways. You always drive the same car, the roads are similar. The rules are different because the legislators decided so. It's the same with stock. What one database accepts, does not necessarily be accepted by another. 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

The clock in the second image appears to have four hands.


daniellei4510 | Forum Volunteer | I just had surgery and my opinions are medically induced.
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025
quote

The clock in the second image appears to have four hands.


By @daniellei4510

I would say that this is an alarm clock, and the fourth hand is the alarm setting. I had an alarm clock like this about fifty years ago.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

Makes sense. Haven't seen an alarm clock in a while. 🙂


daniellei4510 | Forum Volunteer | I just had surgery and my opinions are medically induced.
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Contributor ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

Use a tripod and the shutter release timer in your camera!

 

The 1st photo you shot at 1/20 sec and has camera shake. The second has too shallow depth of field... You could add a message on the white board, and not only help with the focal point, but also add value to your photo illustration.  The 3rd, by itself has no major issues, it could be that it got thrown in the pile of the other two, but the glasses do seem in better focus than the thank you.

 

Re shoot the three and re-submit, that's what I would do! 

Francisco ZALEZPHOTO
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025
quote

You could add a message on the white board, and not only help with the focal point, but also add value to your photo (...) 


By @ZALEZPHOTO

Putting a focussing aid on the white board could be a great idea, but writing something on it would be contra-productive. You would write in what language? Your assets are getting sold worldwide!

 

As a side note: You can add your attached pictures in-line, that would avoid having the people needing to click them. Original refused pictures should be posted as attached images, however. 

 

As a side note-2: I hope you have the right to post those two slides. If not, that could represent a copyright violation.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Advocate ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

A friendly remark from a graphic designer - the letters A,Y and U are mirrored ...  :0)

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

DSC00057_1.jpg  Lacks sharp focus 

DSC00014.jpg - the clock has a logo (IP issue) and the background is mottled 

DSC00245.jpg - DOF too shallow. 

 

 

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

Hello,

You have a dust spot, and I think you can reduce the highlights a bit - the white is overexposed.

Ricky336_1-1749581269373.png

and histogram:

Ricky336_2-1749581301703.png

Image 00014 - shows the overexposed whites - it's a bit too much.

And you do have camera shake!

1/20 sec is too slow to handhold!

Ricky336_3-1749581382868.png

 

And - 00057:

Ricky336_4-1749581519117.png

f/1.2 is too shallow, as you can see, this part is blurred.

For the composition, I think it should be sharp.

 

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025

PS,

Perhaps replace the plant with something more in line with the image, e.g a cup and saucer. 😊

 

Ricky336_0-1749582667508.png

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Jun 10, 2025 Jun 10, 2025
LATEST

As an intellectually curious human, I'm not feeling the vibe. As a customer, I wouldn't buy this.

  • 3 random objects that have no relationship to each other. Why?
  • Backwards facing letters AYU. Why? 
  • Horizontally & vertically skewed letters on a distressed board.  Why?
  • What is the message you're trying to express here?

NancyOShea_0-1749586991639.png

 

For context, this is what you're competing with:

https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=thank+you  2 MILLION results

image.png

 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User, Community Expert & Moderator
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines