Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
The quality cannot be analyzed from these tiny thumbnails. If you want feedback upload a few of the files here at full size.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
There is no need to show us thumbnails, they are of no use for us. You need to show us one or two assets in the quality as submitted. We can check those. You will need to tell us why they got rejected. I guess most of them got rejected for quality issues.
You need to carefully check your assets at 100% for rendering errors. Generative AI makes a lot of those.
If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Machines make lots of mistakes. And they're too stupid to know what mistakes they make to fix them.
Pay close attention to fine details.
Complex images are harder to get right because they contain more elements that can go wrong.
As for neon signs, they're frequently sold in sets rather than individual symbols.
https://stock.adobe.com/search?k=neon+sign