Ran into technical problems. Can you help me?

New Here ,
Feb 06, 2022 Feb 06, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Can you please tell me what's wrong with these images? Why aren't they good enough for adobe stock?

TOPICS
Troubleshooting

Views

95

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Enthusiast , Feb 06, 2022 Feb 06, 2022

Your photos seem to be severely overprocessed with unnatural colour saturation and chromatic aberration.  Most are also suffering from exposure issues.

 

Looking at Möven auf Buhne, the seagulls are blown out with no details, and the ocean is extremely noisy and the water colour does not seem natural.

 

Möven auf Buhne 1.jpg

Take a look at all of your photos at 100% - 200% magnification and the issues become a lot clearer.  You'll see the noise, chromatic aberration (colour fringing), and lack of focus.

 

For your dog on t

...

Likes

Translate

Translate
Contributor ,
Feb 06, 2022 Feb 06, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Follow this forum for a few days and you'll find out how this goes. It is difficult to explain better live it and you will be able to answer yourself

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Enthusiast ,
Feb 06, 2022 Feb 06, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Your photos seem to be severely overprocessed with unnatural colour saturation and chromatic aberration.  Most are also suffering from exposure issues.

 

Looking at Möven auf Buhne, the seagulls are blown out with no details, and the ocean is extremely noisy and the water colour does not seem natural.

 

Möven auf Buhne 1.jpg

Take a look at all of your photos at 100% - 200% magnification and the issues become a lot clearer.  You'll see the noise, chromatic aberration (colour fringing), and lack of focus.

 

For your dog on the beach photo, exposure issues again (beach overexposed and blown out and underexposure of the dog.)  The grass in front of the dog is also very distracting.  It would have been better if you moved and recomposed your shot.

 

With regards to the cat photo, I think it is cropped too close (cutting off its ears) and uneven exposure on the eyes.  The shadows should be lightened to see both eyes.  The fur around the cat's face also has colour fringing probably from overprocessing and too much colour saturation.

 

Adobe customers are looking for natural coloured photos, which are minimally processed.  Read through some of these links to get a better idea of what works for Adobe Stock customers.

 

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/photography-illustrations.html

 

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html

 

https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html

 

I hope this helps,

 

-Rob

 


Rob R, Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 06, 2022 Feb 06, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Photo 1 and 3: underexposed shadows, not focused, purple tint and bad color, poorly cropped. 

Photo 2: underexposed shadows, overexposed highlights, not focused, not horizontal, bad color.

Try this:

landscape-5-3.jpg

Photo 4: underexposed shadows, overexposed highlights, not focused, purple tint and bad color, poorly cropped. 

Photo 5: underexposed shadows, not focused.

Photo 6: underexposed shadows, not focused, poorly cropped. 

Photo 7: underexposed shadows, overexposed highlights, not focused, purple tint and bad color, fringing. 

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 06, 2022 Feb 06, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Adobe Stock customers expect the highest visual and technical quality for use in commercial projects. i.e brochures, posters, print & digital ads, product packaging, billboards, videos & movies, merchandise, etc...


Better luck with your next submission. 🙂

 

Nancy O'Shea, Product User & Community Expert
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 06, 2022 Feb 06, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST
  • Sneed in den Dünen.JPG:

Das Gras vor dem Hund stört, es gibt Bildrauschen (bei ISO 800 ganz normal), der Hund müsste scharf sein. Der Hund is unterbelichtet.

  • Mau.jpg:

Das Bild ist unscharf, bei Porträts müssen immer die Augen scharf sein! Es gibt Farbrauschen, das linke Auge müsste aufgehellt werden, respektive es hätte nicht im Schatten sein dürfen.

  • Ostsee Gras.jpg:

Farbrauschen, unscharf, Vordergrund ist unterbelichtet.

  • Buhnen sunset.jpg

Artefakte

Abambo_0-1644187791326.png,

Farbrauschen

Abambo_1-1644187850287.png,

ausgefranste Lichter bei den Spieglungen.

  • Ostsee big waves 01:

Farb- und Helligkeitsrauschen, unterbelichtet.

  • Möven auf Buhne.jpg

Dass das Möwen sind, sieht man nicht, es sind nur weiße Flecken. Zusätzlich hast Du chromatische Aberration

Abambo_3-1644188265842.png, und Bildrauschen.

  • Ostsee big waves 03.jpg:

Rauschen, Artefakte u. a.

 

Alle Bilder sind überbearbeitet und manche weisen extreme Verfärbungen auf. Die Bilder sollten so bearbeitet sein, dass man die Bearbeitung nicht sieht. Ich glaube nicht, dass eines der Bilder bereits vor der Bearbeitung die Qualitäten besessen haben, die für Stock benötigt werden. Das beste der Bilder ist noch die Katze. Ich bin hier übrigens nicht überzeugt, dass der Ausschnitt zu eng gewählt wurde.

 

Du solltest mit natürlich bearbeiteten Bildern anfangen, die bei 100 % Begutachtung scharf sind und bei 200-300 % keine Artefakte aufzeigen. Ich rate Dir Dich Bild für Bild heranzuarbeiten und nicht gleich ganze Batterien von Bildern hochzuladen.

 

Wenn Sie neu bei Stock sind, sollten Sie diese Ressourcen in Betracht ziehen: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html Bitte lesen Sie das Benutzerhandbuch für Beitragszahler, um weitere Informationen zu Adobe Stock-Beiträgen zu erhalten: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html. Hier finden Sie Informationen zu Ablehnungsgründen: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html und insbesondere zu Qualitäts- und technischen Fragen: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines