Image Rejections

[London346958332gex]

Yes, these are not the reasons!
The reason is probably that the moderators were scolded for accepting all works, including bad ones.
Now they reject all images, including good ones %)))

[A moderator has detached this thread because this side discussion is not effective for the problem.]

[Abambo]

Now they reject all images, including good ones %)))

By @London346958332gex

I've demonstrated that the rejection is for reason. Paying moderators to reject good assets would be dumb, don't you think so? The aim of Adobe is to make a lot of money, not to lose money. You should stop with such arguments.

[London346958332gex]

Of course, paying moderators who don't do their job is stupid!
I understand the essence of this problem.
Before AI, complaints about rejected work were highly subjective; It is clear that any mistake can be justified. To avoid unnecessary disputes, Adobe has established a rule: - the actions of the moderator are not disputed. Thus, the moderators received immunity. You were also trained and forced to defend the actions of the moderator at all costs.
But this is an extreme!
At this extreme, another problem arises: moderators generally stop checking works; they accept and reject without even looking!
All the same, no one will tell him whether he rejected the work correctly or incorrectly. Because the actions of the moderator are not disputed! And the actions of moderators are not checked.
This is more than obvious, just look at the new works.
While you are pointing the arrow at some crooked hair, which is visible under a microscope with 400% magnification, new works continue to show pictures with porridge instead of fingers, which can be seen even without magnification in a small preview. 
Here you will say that it was done by mistake! Naturally, the seven-fingered porridge was taken by mistake. But this means that the job was not even considered. Which suggests that these rejected works were not viewed either!
Why should I stop talking about this?
This is a problem for many; many do not understand the reasons for deviations and see that these deviations are random and chaotic. The same problem occurs in the approved pictures, since there are seven fingers.
Accordingly, both buyers and authors who create quality content suffer here.
Doesn't it matter to you? You all here are doing your best to keep this issue alive! And I can't figure out why.

[Abambo]

Of course, paying moderators who don't do their job is stupid!
I understand the essence of this problem.

By @London346958332gex

You know nothing John Snow. You don't understand how it works and you do not accept the easiest facts. I didn't just comment on hair, but also on other errors. The errors are visible at 100%, whitch is the design size.

We are all agreeing, that too much bad assets pass. But that is not a reason to let pass every asset. If you see bad assets you can report them and they will be rechecked and deleted from the database.

Before AI, complaints about rejected work were highly subjective;

By @London346958332gex

Before generative AI, people complained that their perfect assets failed moderation, and that the moderators were doing a bad job etc pp. And on the other side buyers complained about bad assets. And your conspiracy theories were also present, they just not got defended so vehemently by someone like you who has at least 2 bannded accounts here, because your bad behavior.

You were also trained and forced to defend the actions of the moderator at all costs.

By @London346958332gex

I am a trained engineer and professional photographer. Im not a trained defender of the moderators. To the contrary, I think that the moderation system for generative AI is not good enough. They will need to refuse much more assets. 

As I said before: you should stop such arguments.