Rejected for quality issues

[Delightful_teacher5C49]

Ось моє зображення.

[moderator detached this post from a different one. Please do not hijack the threads with your own grievances]

[Abambo]

Ось моє зображення.

By @Delightful_teacher5C49

I did ask you to open your own thread with your pictures. 

[Abambo]

Artefacts and noise: 

The main subject is not sharp and could fill more of the image.

Your first image has noise and the woods in the background do not have a good contrast. The image looks oversaturated. The shadow and the object in the foreground are disturbing. The asset does not have a point of interest.

[Delightful_teacher5C49]

Well, this is a photo from my phone, you can't get rid of this noise, especially since it was taken with a zoom.

[Abambo]

That's an explanation for the artefacts. But they still do that the asset gets refused. It's part of the quiality requirements.

[Delightful_teacher5C49]

and where there is a lake, I don't know what's wrong, this photo was taken in 48 megapixels in 8K+ quality

[Abambo]

48 mega pixels and 8 k are not quality properties. 

This is what I wrote: Your first image has noise and the woods in the background do not have a good contrast. The image looks oversaturated. The shadow and the object in the foreground are disturbing. The asset does not have a point of interest.

[Delightful_teacher5C49]

The forest is noisy because there was fog then.!

[Abambo]

The forest is noisy because there was fog then.!

By @Delightful_teacher5C49

fog is fog, not noise.

1: fog, 2: noise.