Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I haven't created visuals with AI yet. My recent work has been rejected. Among the possibilities of rejection, there are rejection reasons such as "use of AI and belongs to another artist". I don't think Adobe Stock actually reviews illustrator files. I am a graphic designer and as someone who has been using many Adobe programs such as Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator for 25 years, it saddens me that Adobe stock rejects it like this. It is not fair for users who deal with AI visuals and have no design or painting skills to do stock work with ready-made images. Adobe must find a solution to this. While someone who has been working for years produces around 2000-3000 files on the stock site, is it right that those who upload work with artificial intelligence upload 5000 images in a year?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I've moved your post from Using the Community (for forum questions) to Stock Contributors for you.
Jane
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
If you are interested in a fresh perspective on your rejections, feel free to post 1-2 full sized assets with the rejection reason 🙂
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
What was the reason given to you? We only need the title. The rest is stock text, that may or may not be to the point for your image. It's just an enumeration of popular refusal reasons.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
, is it right that those who upload work with artificial intelligence upload 5000 images in a year?
By @erdincaltun
Generative AI contributors could upload 2-3000 assets a month.
Fair or not fair, you have to live with generative AI, it won't go away again.