• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Rechazo fotografía

New Here ,
Feb 07, 2023 Feb 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Buenos días

Para seguir aprendiendo, me gustaría que me aconsejaran y que me indicaaran que defectos ven en la imágen que adjunto y que fue rechazada.

Muchas gracias

TOPICS
Troubleshooting

Views

192

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Feb 07, 2023 Feb 07, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

What a wonderful shot! But Adobe make no allowance for being a difficult or rare picture. The black bird is completely blurred, but from an artistic point of view it is a key subject, and the hawk is not completely sharp. There are artefacts around the edges of the hawk.  I form a general impression that this is not a single photo, but a composite. (Composites can be good but they must be perfectly realistic).

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 08, 2023 Feb 08, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hola,

I think that the photo may have been rejected because of the sharpness, as well as signs of artifacts. You took this at high ISO - 1600, so because you used some noise reduction, it has also softened the bird a bit.

_MG_4008sharpness.jpg

However, I think you have done a good job of capturing the bird in flight.

For the other bird, you have this:  (from the Raven's (?) body artifacts)

_MG_4008artifacts.jpg

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Feb 08, 2023 Feb 08, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I can understand the noise due to the high iso, but it seems to me that you have to zoom in a lot for this detail to be visible and in print it goes unnoticed...
So I will take note for later photographs

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 08, 2023 Feb 08, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Both are shown at 100%!

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Feb 08, 2023 Feb 08, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Adobe recommends that contributors inspect their images carefully by zooming in between 100-200%. The blur of the black bird is readily apparent at even a small size, and the issues with the other bird are noticeable at 100%. Adobe needs to be able to offer their Buyers images that can be utilized commercially in a variety of sizes, not just small prints.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Beginner ,
Feb 08, 2023 Feb 08, 2023

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I think it has been rejected due to the sharpness and the noise.

But it is a great shot.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines