Refusal due to low commercial and aesthetic value

[Olexandr22522449d3x6]

Greetings to all. I was refused with the wording of low commercial and aesthetic value. I thought that the image of icicles in winter might interest people. Moreover, I have seen many similar photos on different photobanks. Am I wrong and such photos are not needed? Or the point is that this particular photo is bad. I would be glad to hear critical comments on it. Thanks to everyone who will check it out.

[moderator corrected formatting error]

[Abambo · Accepted solution]

Or the point is that this particular photo is bad.
By @Olexandr22522449d3x6

The quality of the picture is bad and the aesthetic aspect of your picture is missing. Your picture is not in focus, I see chromatic aberration and I see washed out colours. In addition, it's underexposed. The moderator did not want to encourage you to correct (some of) the errors and then resubmit.

[ricky336 · Accepted solution]

Hello,

You need to ask yourself, how this can be used. As it stands, it dosen't say anything about winter. There are a ton of such pictures on Adobe, so this in comparison isn't that good I'm afraid.

[Nancy OShea · Accepted solution]

I agree with the reviewer.  It's unlikely that anybody will pay money for this shot. 

Comparing your shot with another one in Adobe Stock,  which one do you think is better and why?