Refusal due to low commercial and aesthetic value

Participant ,
Jan 10, 2022 Jan 10, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Greetings to all. I was refused with the wording of low commercial and aesthetic value. I thought that the image of icicles in winter might interest people. Moreover, I have seen many similar photos on different photobanks. Am I wrong and such photos are not needed? Or the point is that this particular photo is bad. I would be glad to hear critical comments on it. Thanks to everyone who will check it out.

 

[moderator corrected formatting error]

TOPICS
Contributor critique

Views

80

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 3 Correct answers

Adobe Community Professional , Jan 10, 2022 Jan 10, 2022
quote
Or the point is that this particular photo is bad.
By @Olexandr22522449d3x6

The quality of the picture is bad and the aesthetic aspect of your picture is missing. Your picture is not in focus, I see chromatic aberration and I see washed out colours. In addition, it's underexposed. The moderator did not want to encourage you to correct (some of) the errors and then resubmit.

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional , Jan 10, 2022 Jan 10, 2022

Hello,

You need to ask yourself, how this can be used. As it stands, it dosen't say anything about winter. There are a ton of such pictures on Adobe, so this in comparison isn't that good I'm afraid.

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional , Jan 10, 2022 Jan 10, 2022

I agree with the reviewer.  It's unlikely that anybody will pay money for this shot. 

 

Comparing your shot with another one in Adobe Stock,  which one do you think is better and why?

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

Likes

Translate

Translate
Adobe Community Professional ,
Jan 10, 2022 Jan 10, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

quote
Or the point is that this particular photo is bad.
By @Olexandr22522449d3x6

The quality of the picture is bad and the aesthetic aspect of your picture is missing. Your picture is not in focus, I see chromatic aberration and I see washed out colours. In addition, it's underexposed. The moderator did not want to encourage you to correct (some of) the errors and then resubmit.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Jan 10, 2022 Jan 10, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Hello,

You need to ask yourself, how this can be used. As it stands, it dosen't say anything about winter. There are a ton of such pictures on Adobe, so this in comparison isn't that good I'm afraid.

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Adobe Community Professional ,
Jan 10, 2022 Jan 10, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

I agree with the reviewer.  It's unlikely that anybody will pay money for this shot. 

 

Comparing your shot with another one in Adobe Stock,  which one do you think is better and why?

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

Nancy O'Shea, Adobe Product User & Community Professional
Alt-Web Design & Publishing ~ Web : Print : Graphics : Media

Likes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines