Copy link to clipboard
Copied
How is it possible that half of a series of photos with the same title and description is rejected (REFUSAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY) and the other half is accepted
Adri
As stated in Keukenhof's website:
"The use Keukenhof’s name and/or photographs and videos for commercial purposes is also prohibited."
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Sometimes things get past the moderators which should be rejected. If these are found later, Adobe may remove the asset, or worse. Also, the title and description are not the only thing checked. Please post ONE rejected photo, with the title and description used, so we can suggest what IP is involved. It's easy to miss something, like the name on a boat in the distance, or a recognisable pair of shoes. Or sometimes it is big things, like the Eiffel Tower at night.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Keukenhof Flower Gardens. Keukenhof, also known as the Garden of Europe, is one of the world's largest flower gardens, situated in the in the municipality of Lisse, in the Netherlands
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
As stated in Keukenhof's website:
"The use Keukenhof’s name and/or photographs and videos for commercial purposes is also prohibited."
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
As stated in Keukenhof's website:
"The use Keukenhof’s name and/or photographs and videos for commercial purposes is also prohibited."
@A3VDB ,
In this case, I strongly recommend that you take down the accepted pictures too.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
two more rejected photos
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
I suppose you had two or more moderators and some moderators didn't realize, that those pictures require property releases from the rights owners.
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Adobe uses method of scientific random poke. My image containing Taipei 101 was rejected with "intellectual property" excuse, whilst there are literally hundereds of photos sporting exactly the same view.
I assume that [inappropriate language] of a moderator in question affects acceptance process - imagine they sit in the office clicking through images that someone else is taking...of course they will take out irritation on you.
[moderator: these fora are moderated and inappropriate language will be deleted. Please keep a factual tone to the posts]
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Do you really think Adobe hires stupid/spiteful Moderators? How would it benefit Adobe to do so? How can they be spiteful to a Contributor that they can't even possibly know?
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
Please watch your language. Taipei 101 is for sure a protected landmark architecture. Of course, Adobe is not alone by refusing those images: https://wiki.gettyimages.com/taipei-101/
Copy link to clipboard
Copied
You are violating Adobe's Support Community Guidelines.
If you persist, your access will be terminated and all of your posts deleted.
Do you wish to remain a participant here or not? The ball is in your court now.