3 Correct answers
I suspect that it does not meet Adobe's definition of " nudity with artistic value". It does seem that you took this image surreptitiously. I would not define this as having artistic value.
From this Help page: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/submission-guidelines.html
Follow the rules on nudity.
For submissions containing nudity that has artistic value, the model must be at least 18 years old and the model release must include the model's photo ID so we can verify age. Never s
...
Hello!
Reason of rejection - impolite, indecent photo that humilitates the model. Angle of view - it looks like photographer was hiding, stalking and shooting people without their permission.
Shutterstock is not a criterion. Adobe and Shutterstock are two different companies with different standarts.
Hi @names58321676 ,
For the reviewers it's a matter of if the files are to be accepted or not. Their job is not to find the faults of our files and inform us to correct them to resubmit. That would be the case if it was a training exercise. As far as they are concerned you should check to ensure your files are of acceptable quality. It is possible that each time you submit the file it goes to a different person, in which case you get different reactions. Once the reviewer sees a reason for rejec
...
28
Replies
AdChoices
